5 The Three Kings
　　No doubt most of us have heard the Christmas Carol “We three kings of Orient are;” but in fact, the three “kings” are never referred to as Kings in the Bible. Additionally, they are not referred to as a group of three. The only reference to the number ‘3′ is the number of gifts they carried. [Matthew 2:7-11]
　　5 三列王
　　毫无疑问，我们大多数人都听过耶诞颂歌“东方三贤士”；但事实上这三位“王”在圣经中从未被提过是“国王”。另外，他们也没有被提及是三人成组的，唯一提及的关于他们的数字“3”是他们携带的礼物。[马太福音 2:7-11]
　　

       4 Mary Magdalene’s Career
　　Nowhere in the Bible does it say that Mary Magdalene was a prostitute. In fact, she is barely mentioned at all. Aside from her presence at the ressurection, the only other thing that the Bible does say is that she was possessed¹ by seven demons². [Luke 8:2]
　　4 抹大拉的玛利亚的职业
　　圣经中没有指出抹大拉的玛利亚是一名妓女，事实上她很少被提及，除了在耶稣复活时有提到过她。圣经中唯一提及她的另一处则是她被七个污鬼附身。[路加福音 8:2]
　　

       3 The Prodigal³ Son
　　Contrary to popular belief, “Prodigal” means “characterized by a profuse⁴ or wasteful⁵ expenditure” - it is not a reference to leaving or returning. [Luke 15:11-32]
　　3 浪子回头
　　与如今大家普遍理解的相反，“浪”在圣经中的意思是指“挥霍浪费掉许多财产”--它指的不是离乡后的回归。[路加福音 15:11-32]
　　

        2 Emperor Constantine and the Bible
　　The Emperor Constantine did not define the canon of the New Testament⁶ at the first Council of Nicaea in 325AD - in fact, the Council did not even make mention of the Biblical canon. It was already defined by common use by the early 2nd century in the form in which it is still found in Catholic Bibles. Another little known fact is the Emperor Constantine had no voting power at the council - he was there merely as an observer. [Canons of the Council of Nicaea]
　　2 康斯坦丁大帝与圣经
　　公元325年第一次普世大会在尼西亚召开时，康斯坦丁大帝并没有规定出新教的教规--事实上，大会甚至没有提及圣经的教规。实际上教规采用了二世纪早期常用的格式，而这一格式在现今天主教圣经中仍普遍存在。另一个鲜为人知的事实是，康斯坦丁大帝在大会上其实没有投票权--因为他只是旁观者。
　　

        1 Changing Text
　　Some people believe that over the centuries, the Bible text has been altered to suit the ideologies⁷ of the editors. In fact, there are only a very small number of textual alterations⁸ that modern philologists⁹ and critics consider intentional¹⁰ changes; most are simply errors in spelling or copying. Bart D. Ehrman (a New Testament textual critic) says:
　　“It would be a mistake. . .to assume that the only changes being made were by copyists with a personal stake in the wording of the text. In fact, most of the changes found in our early Christian¹¹ manuscripts have nothing to do with theology or ideology¹². Far and and away the [sic] most changes are the result of mistakes, pure and simple—slips of the pen, accidental omissions¹³, inadvertent additions, misspelled words, blunders of one sort or another.”
　　Aside from the removal of a number of books in the 16th Century, the Bible is essentially¹⁴ the same now as it was in the 2nd century.
　　1 文本的变迁
　　有人认为在经过几个世纪的变迁，圣经的文本内容已经遭到修改，为了符合编者的意识形态。事实上，现代语言学家和评论家认为只有极少一部分文本内容被有意修改；其他大部分的错误是由于拼写或复写时出现了错误。巴特·D·叶尔曼说：
　　“圣经中所有被改动的地方都是因为抄写者个人对文本的理解产生出入而修改的，这种想法是不对的。事实上，从我们早期的基督教手稿中发现大多数错误与理论或意识形态没有什么关系。可以肯定的是【原文如此】大多数都是单纯的错误--一时的笔误，无意的增减，单词拼错以及各种类似的错误。”
　　除了在16世纪时被刻意移除过几章之外，圣经从本质上来看与二世纪时是一样的。