(单词翻译:单击)
There is no link between a lack of musical ability and dyslexia(阅读障碍) . Moreover, attempts to treat dyslexia with music therapy are unwarranted(无保证的,无根据的) , according to scientists in Belgium writing in the current issue of the International Journal of Arts and Technology. Cognitive1 neuroscientist José Morais of the Free University of Brussels and colleagues point out that research into dyslexia has pointed2 to a problem with how the brain processes sounds and how dyslexic readers manipulate the sounds from which words are composed, the phonemes(音素,音位) , consciously and intentionally3. It was a relatively4 short step between the notion that dyslexia is an issue of phonological processing and how this might also be associated with poor musical skills – amusia(失音症,失歌症) – that has led to approaches to treating the condition using therapy to improve a dyslexic reader's musical skills.
Morais and colleagues demonstrate that theoretically this is an invalid5 argument and also present experimental evidence to show that there is no justification6 either for the link or for using music therapy to treat dyslexia.
Language and music are apparently7 uniquely human traits and many researchers have tried to find direct links between the two. A whole industry of music therapy hinges on(以……为转移) this purported8 association with claims that language remediation(补救,矫正) is possible through the application of learning in music. Given the social importance of literacy(读写能力,精通文学) , a role for music in helping9 poor or dyslexic readers to overcome their difficulties has been at the forefront of therapy for many years. Morais' team points out that the notion is based on studies that are generally flawed in two respects.
The first problem with studies that attempt to link a lack of musical ability with reading difficulties is that the quality of published empirical studies(实证研究,经验研究) is quite variable and many reviews of the field fail to discard papers containing insufficient10 information, either on materials and methods, or on the experimental results. The second flaw is that many studies imply an explicit11(清楚的,明确的) causality between amusia and dyslexia on the basis of results that are themselves merely statistical12 correlations13(相互关系,统计) . Such an approach to science leads to a circular argument in which some researchers argue that music discrimination predicts phonological skills, which in turn predicts reading ability and that reading ability implies phonological(音韵学的) skills and so on.
More recent studies have broken the link between hearing and reading by showing that deaf children, who often learn to perceive speech accurately14 using lip reading and visual clues can have literacy levels just as high as hearing children. Of course, most of those children do not develop good musical ability with respect to musical pitch. Conversely, people who are unable even to hum a familiar tune15 show normal literacy levels.
Music and speech do overlap16(重叠,重复) , but musical sounds and phonemes are not the same, the researchers explain. Musical tones are simply sounds, however, they are produced and can be heard without recourse to(求助于,依赖) complex auditory analysis. Phonemes, in contrast, whether spoken or read, are abstractions of the units into which language might be broken down. They are purely17 symbolic18 and require significantly more interpretation19 to understand than simply hearing a sound.
"The conscious representations of phonemes play a crucial role in the learning of literacy abilities in the alphabetic20 writing system. Children do not become spontaneously aware of phonemes. Nor do they become aware of phonemes by learning music," the researchers say. The team has now studied the differing abilities of children, both with and without dyslexia, on understanding and interpretation of phonemes and syllables21 and musical notes and the intervals22 between them in a melody. They saw no significant differences between dyslexic readers and age-matched normal readers in the melodic23 tests.
Literacy is crucially dependent on phonological skills, but alphabetic literacy is strongly constrained24(强迫,驱使) by the development of phoneme awareness25 and abilities, and phonemes have no correspondence in music, the team explains. Thus, although music, through its emotional characteristics, might be a great motivational support for speech-based therapy, this limits, to a large extent, the possibilities of using music training to re-educate dyslexic readers.
收听单词发音
1
cognitive
|
|
| adj.认知的,认识的,有感知的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
2
pointed
|
|
| adj.尖的,直截了当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
3
intentionally
|
|
| ad.故意地,有意地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
4
relatively
|
|
| adv.比较...地,相对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
5
invalid
|
|
| n.病人,伤残人;adj.有病的,伤残的;无效的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
6
justification
|
|
| n.正当的理由;辩解的理由 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
7
apparently
|
|
| adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
8
purported
|
|
| adj.传说的,谣传的v.声称是…,(装得)像是…的样子( purport的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
9
helping
|
|
| n.食物的一份&adj.帮助人的,辅助的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
10
insufficient
|
|
| adj.(for,of)不足的,不够的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
11
explicit
|
|
| adj.详述的,明确的;坦率的;显然的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
12
statistical
|
|
| adj.统计的,统计学的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
13
correlations
|
|
| 相互的关系( correlation的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
14
accurately
|
|
| adv.准确地,精确地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
15
tune
|
|
| n.调子;和谐,协调;v.调音,调节,调整 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
16
overlap
|
|
| v.重叠,与…交叠;n.重叠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
17
purely
|
|
| adv.纯粹地,完全地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
18
symbolic
|
|
| adj.象征性的,符号的,象征主义的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
19
interpretation
|
|
| n.解释,说明,描述;艺术处理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
20
alphabetic
|
|
| adj.照字母次序的,字母的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
21
syllables
|
|
| n.音节( syllable的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
22
intervals
|
|
| n.[军事]间隔( interval的名词复数 );间隔时间;[数学]区间;(戏剧、电影或音乐会的)幕间休息 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
23
melodic
|
|
| adj.有旋律的,调子美妙的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
24
constrained
|
|
| adj.束缚的,节制的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|
25
awareness
|
|
| n.意识,觉悟,懂事,明智 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
|