"
Superfluous1 efforts," he cries, "this is not what I must have... to the business... the business... however pitiable my state... I can hold back no longer... come, Countess, your arms!"
He seizes her
ferociously2, places her as I was placed, arms suspended by two black
straps3; mine is the task of securing the bands; he inspects the knots: finding them too loose, he
tightens4 them, "So that," he says, "the blood will
spurt5 out under greater pressure"; he feels the
veins6, and lances them, on each arm, at almost the same moment. Blood leaps far: he is in an
ecstasy7; and adjusting himself so that he has a clear view of these two fountains, he has me kneel between his legs so I can suck him; he does as much for first one and then the other of his little friends,
incessantly8 eyeing the jets of blood which
inflame9 him. For my part, certain the instant at which the hoped for crisis occurs will bring a conclusion to the Countess'
torments10, I bring all my efforts to bear upon
precipitating11 this
denouement12, and I become, as, Madame, you observe, I become a whore from kindness, a
libertine13 through
virtue14. The much awaited moment arrives at last; I am not familiar with its dangers or violence, for the last time it had taken place I had been unconscious... Oh, Madame! what extravagance! Gernande remained
delirious15 for ten minutes,
flailing16 his arms, staggering, reeling like one falling in a fit of epilepsy, and uttering screams which must have been audible for a league around; his oaths were excessive;
lashing17 out at everyone at hand, his strugglings were dreadful. The two little ones are sent tumbling head over heels; he wishes to fly at his wife, I restrain him: I pump the last drop from him, his need of me makes him respect me; at last I bring him to his senses by ridding him of that
fiery18 liquid, whose heat, whose
viscosity19, and above all whose abundance puts him in such a
frenzy20 I believe he is going to expire; seven or eight tablespoons would scarcely have contained the discharge, and the thickest
gruel21 would hardly give a notion of its
consistency22; and with all that, no appearance of an erection at all, rather, the limp look and feel of
exhaustion23: there you have the contrarieties which, better than might I, explain artists of the Count's breed. The Count ate excessively and only dissipated each time he bled his wife, every four days, that is to say. Would this be the cause of the phenomenon? I have no idea, and not daring to ascribe a reason to what I do not understand, I will be content to relate what I saw.
However, I rush to the Countess, I
stanch24 her blood,
untie25 her, and deposit her upon a couch in a state of extreme weakness; but the Count, totally indifferent to her, without
condescending27 to cast even a glance at this victim stricken by his rage,
abruptly28 goes out with his aides, leaving me to put things in whatever order I please. Such is the fatal
apathy29 which better than all else characterizes the true libertine soul: if he is merely carried away by passion's heat,
limned30 with
remorse31 will be his face when, calmed again, he
beholds32 the baleful effects of
delirium33; but if his soul is
utterly34 corrupt35? then such consequences will affright him not: he will observe them with as little trouble as regret, perhaps even with some of the emotion of those
infamous36 lusts37 which produced them.
I put Madame de Gernande to bed. She had, so she said, lost much more this time than she ordinarily did; but such good care and so many restoratives were
lavished38 upon her, that she appeared well two days later. That same evening, when I had completed all my chores in the Countess' apartment, word arrived that the Count desired to speak to me; Gernande was taking supper; I was obliged to wait upon him while he fed with a much greater
intemperance39 than at dinner; four of his pretty little friends were seated round the table with him and there, every evening, he regularly drank himself into drunkenness; but to that end, twenty bottles of the most excellent wine were scarcely sufficient and I often saw him empty thirty. And every evening,
propped40 up by his
minions41, the debauchee went to bed, and took one or two of the boys with him; these were nothing but vehicles which disposed him for the great scene.
But I had discovered the secret of winning this man's very highest
esteem42: he
frankly43 avowed44 to me that few women had pleased him so much; and
thereby45 I acquired the right to his confidence, which I only exploited in order to serve my mistress.
One morning Gernande called me to his room to inform me of some new libertine schemes; after having listened closely and approved enthusiastically, and seeing him in a
relatively46 calm state, I undertook to persuade him to
mitigate47 his poor wife's fate. "Is it possible, Monsieur," I said to him, "that one may treat a woman in this manner, even setting aside all the ties which
bind48 you to her ?
Condescend26 to reflect upon her sex's
touching49 graces."#p#分页标题#e#
"Oh Therese!" the Count answered with
alacrity50, "why in order to
pacify51 me do you bring me arguments which could not more
positively52 arouse me? Listen to me, my dear girl," he continued, having me take a place beside him, "and whatever the invectives you may hear me utter against your sex, don't lose your temper; no, a reasoned discussion; I'll yield to your arguments if they're logically sound.
"How are you
justified53, pray tell me, Therese, in asserting that a husband lies under the obligation to make his wife happy? and what titles dares this woman cite in order to
extort54 this happiness from her husband? The necessity mutually to render one another happy cannot
legitimately56 exist save between two persons equally furnished with the capacity to do one another hurt and, consequently, between two persons of commensurate strength: such an association can never come into being unless a contract is immediately formed between these two persons, which obligates each to employ against the other no kind of force but what will not be injurious to either; but this ridiculous convention assuredly can never obtain between two persons one of whom is strong and the other weak. What entitles the latter to require the former to treat
kindly57 with him? and what sort of a fool would the stronger have to be in order to
subscribe58 to such an agreement? I can agree not to employ force against him whose own strength makes him to be feared; but what could motivate me to moderate the effects of my strength upon the being Nature subordinates to me? Pity, do you say? That sentiment is fitting for no one but the person who resembles me and as he is an egoist too, pity's effects only occur under the tacit circumstances in which the individual who inspires my
commiseration59 has sympathy for me in his turn; but if my superiority assures me a constant
ascendancy60 over him, his sympathy becoming valueless to me, I need never, in order to excite it, consent to any sacrifice. Would I not be a fool to feel pity for the chicken they
slaughtered61 for my dinner? That object, too inferior to me, lacking any relation to me, can never excite any feelings in me; well, the relationships of a wife to her husband and that of the chicken to myself are of identical consequence, the one and the other are household
chattels62 which one must use, which one must employ for the purpose indicated by Nature, without any
differentiation63 whatsoever64. But, I ask, had it been Nature's intention to create your sex for the happiness of ours and
vice65 versa, would this blind Nature have caused the existence of so many ineptitudes in the construction of the one and the other of those sexes? Would she have implanted faults so grave in each that
mutual55 estrangement66 and
antipathy67 were bound infallibly to be their result? Without going any further in search of examples, be so good as to tell me, Therese, knowing my organization to be what it is, what woman could I render happy? and, reversibly, to what man can the
enjoyment68 of a woman be sweet when he is not endowed with the gigantic proportions necessary to satisfy her? In your opinion, will they be moral qualities which will
compensate69 his physical shortcomings? And what thinking being, upon knowing a woman to her depths, will not cry with Euripides: 'That one amongst the Gods who brought women into the world may boast of having produced the worst of all creatures and the most
afflicting70 to man.' If then it is demonstrated that the two sexes do not at all sort agreeably with each other and that there is not one well-founded
grievance71 of the one which could not equally and immediately be voiced by the other, it is therefore false, from this moment, to say that Nature created them for their reciprocal happiness. She may have permitted them the desire to
attain72 each other's vicinity in order to
conjugate73 in the interests of propagation, but in no wise in order to form
attachments74 with the design of discovering a mutual felicity. The weaker therefore having no right to mouth complaints with the object of
wresting75 pity from the stronger and no longer being able to raise the objection that the stronger depends for his happiness upon her, the weaker, I say, has no alternative but to submit; and as, despite the difficulty of achieving that
bilateral76 happiness, it is natural that individuals of both sexes
labor77 at nothing but to
procure78 it for themselves, the weaker must reconcile herself to
distilling79 from her submissiveness the only dose of happiness she can possibly hope to
cull80, and the stronger must strive after his by whatever oppressive methods he is pleased to employ, since it is proven that the mighty's sole happiness is yielded him by the exercise of his strong
faculties81, by, that is to say, the most thorough-going tyranny; thus, that happiness the two sexes cannot find with each other they will find, one in blind
obedience82, the other in the most energetic expression of his domination. Why! were it not Nature's intention that one of the sexes tyrannize the other, would she not have created them equally strong? By
rendering83 one in every particular inferior to the other, has she not adequately indicated that she wills the
mightier84 to exploit the rights she has given him? the more the latter broadens his authority, the more, by means of his preponderance, he worsens the
misery85 of the woman
enthralled86 by her destiny, the better he answers Nature's intentions; the
frail87 being's complaints do not provide a correct basis for
analyzing88 the process;
judgments89 thus come by would be nothing if not vicious, since, to reach them, you would have to appropriate none but the feeble's ideas: the suit must be judged upon the stronger party's power, upon the scope he has given to his power, and when this power's effects are brought to bear upon a woman, one must examine the question, What is a woman? and how has this
contemptible90 sex been viewed in ancient times and in our own by seventy-five per cent of the peoples of this earth?#p#分页标题#e#