Chapter 16
We are all born like Catholics, aren't we - in
limbo1, without religion, until some figure introduces us to God? After that meeting the matter ends for most of us. If there is a change, it is usually for the
lesser2 rather than the greater; many people seem to lose God along life's way. That was not my case. The figure in question for me was an older sister of Mother's, of a more traditional mind, who brought me to a temple when I was a small baby. Auntie Rohini was delighted to meet her newborn nephew and thought she would include Mother Goddess in the delight. "It will be his
symbolic3 first outing," she said. It's a samskara!" Symbolic indeed. We were in Madurai; I was the fresh veteran of a seven-hour train journey. No matter. Off we went on this Hindu
rite4 of passage, Mother carrying me, Auntie propelling her. I have no conscious memory of this first go-around in a temple, but some smell of
incense5, some play of light and shadow, some flame, some burst of colour, something of the sultriness and mystery of the place must have stayed with me. A germ of religious exaltation, no bigger than a mustard seed, was sown in me and left to
germinate6. It has never stopped growing since that day.
I am a Hindu because of sculptured
cones7 of red kumkum powder and baskets of yellow turmeric nuggets, because of garlands of flowers and pieces of broken
coconut8, because of the clanging of bells to announce one's arrival to God, because of the
whine9 of the reedy nadaswaram and the beating of drums, because of the patter of bare feet against stone floors down dark corridors pierced by
shafts10 of sunlight, because of the
fragrance11 of incense, because of flames of arati lamps circling in the darkness, because of bhajans being sweetly sung, because of elephants
standing12 around to bless, because of colourful murals telling colourful stories, because of foreheads carrying, variously signified, the same word - faith. I became loyal to these sense impressions even before I knew what they meant or what they were for. It is my heart that commands me so. I feel at home in a Hindu temple. I am aware of Presence, not personal the way we usually feel presence, but something larger. My heart still skips a beat when I catch sight of the murti, of God Residing, in the inner sanctum of a temple. Truly I am in a sacred cosmic womb, a place where everything is born, and it is my sweet luck to
behold13 its living core. My hands naturally come together in
reverent14 worship. I hunger for prasad, that sugary offering to God that comes back to us as a sanctified treat. My palms need to feel the heat of a hallowed flame whose
blessing15 I bring to my eyes and forehead.
But religion is more than rite and ritual. There is what the rite and ritual stand for. Here too I am a Hindu. The universe makes sense to me through Hindu eyes. There is Brahman, the world soul, the sustaining frame upon which is woven,
warp16 and weft, the cloth of being, with all its
decorative17 elements of space and time. There is Brahman nirguna, without qualities, which lies beyond understanding, beyond description, beyond approach; with our poor words we sew a suit for it - One, Truth,
Unity18, Absolute, Ultimate Reality, Ground of Being - and try to make it fit, but Brahman nirguna always bursts the seams. We are left speechless. But there is also Brahman saguna, with qualities, where the suit fits. Now we call it Shiva, Krishna, Shakti, Ganesha; we can approach it with some understanding; we can discern certain attributes - loving, merciful, frightening; - and we feel the gentle pull of relationship. Brahman saguna is Brahman made manifest to our limited senses, Brahman expressed not only in gods but in humans, animals, trees, in a handful of earth, for everything has a trace of the divine in it. The truth of life is that Brahman is no different from atman, the spiritual force within us, what you might call the soul. The individual soul touches upon the world soul like a well reaches for the water table. That which sustains the universe beyond thought and language, and that which is at the core of us and struggles for expression, is the same thing. The finite within the infinite, the infinite within the finite. If you ask me how Brahman and atman relate
precisely19, I would say in the same way the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit relate: mysteriously. But one thing is clear: atman seeks to realize Brahman, to be united with the Absolute, and it travels in this life on a pilgrimage where it is born and dies, and is born again and dies again, and again, and again, until it manages to shed the sheaths that
imprison20 it here below. The paths to liberation are numerous, but the bank along the way is always the same, the Bank of Karma, where the liberation account of each of us is credited or
debited21 depending on our actions.
This, in a holy nutshell, is Hinduism, and I have been a Hindu all my life. With its notions in mind I see my place in the universe.
But we should not cling! A plague upon fundamentalists and literalists! I am reminded of a story of Lord Krishna when he was a cowherd. Every night he invites the milkmaids to dance with him in the forest. They come and they dance. The night is dark, the fire in their midst roars and crackles, the beat of the music gets ever faster - the girls dance and dance and dance with their sweet lord, who has made himself so abundant as to be in the arms of each and every girl. But the moment the girls become possessive, the moment each one imagines that Krishna is her partner alone, he vanishes. So it is that we should not be jealous with God.
I know a woman here in Toronto who is very dear to my heart. She was my foster mother. I call her Auntieji and she likes that. She is Quebecoise. Though she has lived in Toronto for over thirty years, her French-speaking mind still slips on occasion on the understanding of English sounds. And so, when she first heard of Hare Krishnas, she didn't hear right. She heard "Hairless
Christians22," and that is what they were to her for many years. When I corrected her, I told her that in fact she was not so wrong; that Hindus, in their capacity for love, are indeed hairless Christians, just as Muslims, in the way they see God in everything, are bearded Hindus, and Christians, in their devotion to God, are hat-wearing Muslims.
第十六章
们出生时都像天主教徒一样,不是吗——身处地狱边缘,没有宗教信仰,直到某个人把我们引到了上帝面前。在那次见面之后,对我们大多数人来说,事情就结束 了。如果有什么变化,通常也是变得对上帝更加怀疑,而不是更加坚信;很多人似乎在生活中失去了上帝。我的情况不是这样。对我来说,我刚才说到的那个人物就 是母亲的一个姐姐,她思想更加传统,在我还是个婴儿的时候,她就把我带进了一座庙宇里。罗西妮姨妈很高兴见到她刚刚出生的外甥,而且想要女神之主也分享这 一喜悦。
“这会是他具有象征意义的第一次郊游,”她说,“这是家祭(家祭,指印度教教徒从受胎到死亡各阶段所举行的个人净化仪式。)!
”的确很有象征意义。我们当时在马杜赖;坐了七个小时的火车之后,我刚刚成了一个经验丰富的老乘客。这无关紧要。我们出发了,去举行这印度教的通过 礼仪,母亲抱着我,姨妈推着她。对第一次参观庙宇,我并没有记忆,但是香烟的某种气味,光与影的某种变幻,某种火焰,某种鲜亮的色彩,这个地方某种令人动 情的神秘的东西一定在我心中留下了印象。一粒只有芥子那么大的宗教升华的种子在我心里种下了,并且开始发芽。自从那天开始,它从未停止过生长。我成了一个 印度教徒,是因为那裴在一个个有雕刻圆锥形卷筒里的红色郁金粉和一篮篮黄色姜黄块,因为一只只花环和一块块碎椰子,因为宣布某人来到神的面前的丁丁当当的 钟声,因为芦苇做的纳达斯瓦拉姆(纳达斯瓦拉姆,印度南部一种乐器,类似于单簧管。)的呜咽声和鼓的咚咚声,因为光脚走过射进一束束阳光的昏暗的走廊时在 石板上发出的啪哒啪哒声,因为香烟的芬芳气味,因为进行阿拉提知寸在黑暗中转着圈的油灯的火苗,因为甜蜜吟唱的祈祷歌,因为四周站着的祈神赐福的大象,因 为述说着有声有色故事的色彩鲜艳的壁画,因为人们额头上用不同的方式写着同一个词——信仰。
甚至在了解这些的意义和目的之前,我就已经忠实于这些感觉印象了。是我的心要求我这么做的。我在印度教庙宇里感到无拘无柬。我能意识到神就在那儿, 不是以我们通常感觉存在的个人方式,而是更加宏大。当我现在看见庙宇圣所里的像,那神之所在的时候,我的心还是会停跳一下。我的确是在一个神圣的宇宙子宫 里,一切都是从那里出生的,我能看见它的核心,这是我极大的幸运。我的双手自然地合在一起,虔诚地膜拜。我渴望得到惠赐,那献给神之后又作为神圣的款待返 回给我们的甜蜜的供物。我的手掌需要感受神圣的火焰的热量,我把这热量的赐福放在眼睛上和额头上。(阿拉提,印度教的一种仪式,由祭司手持油灯在神像面前 进行,信徒用手轻轻覆盖灯火,然后在自己的眼睛上碰麓一下,代表接受神祗赐予的力量。)
但是宗教不仅仅是礼仪和仪式。还有礼仪和仪式所象征的意义。在这一点上我也是~个印度教徒。宇宙通过印度教徒的眼睛对我产生了意义。还有梵天(梵天,印度 教主神之一,为创造之神,亦指终生之本。),世界的灵魂,用经线和纬线在上面织成存在之布的支撑框架,布上有各种空间和时间的装饰。还有至尊非人格梵天, 没有质量,不可理解,不可描述,不可企及;我们用可怜的语言为它缝制了一套外衣——一体,真理,统一,绝对,最高实在,存在基础——努力想让衣服合身,但 是至尊非人格梵天总是撑破了线缝。我们说不出话来。但是还有至尊人格梵天,它有质量,这套外衣也合它的身。现在我们称它为湿婆,克利须那,萨克蒂,象头 神;我们可以通过部分地理解它去接近它;我们可以识别某些特征——仁爱,慈悲,令人惊恐——我们还能感到我们和它之间的联系在轻轻地吸引着我们。至尊人格 梵天是在我们有限的感觉面前体现的梵天,足不仅通过神,而且通过人、动物、树木、一捧泥土表现出来的梵天,因为一切都有神的踪迹。生命的真理在于,梵天与 自我,也就是我们心中的精神力量,你可以称之为灵魂的东西,并没有什么不同,个人的灵魂向世界灵魂接近,就像一口井向地下水位靠近。支撑着思想和语言之外 的宇宙的,和我们内心挣扎着表达的,是同样的东西。无限之中的有限,有限之中的无限。如果你问我梵天和自我之间究竟是如何联系的,我会说就像圣父、圣子、 圣灵之间的联系一样,是神秘的。但是有一件事很清楚:自我努力了解梵天,努力与绝对相结合,并且在今生踏上了朝圣的旅程,在这个旅程中出生和死亡,再次出 生又再次死亡,一次又一次,直到它络于摆脱了将它囚禁在下面的外壳。通往自由的道路有无数条,但是沿途的堤岸都是一样的,那是羯磨之岸,在那里,行为的不 同决定了我们每个人的自由账目是记人贷方还是记人借方。
这就是印度教,它存在于神圣外壳里,我一辈子都是印度教徒。心里有了印度教的观念,我看见了自己在宇宙中的位置。
但是我们不应该拘泥于字面理解!愿上天降祸于原义者和拘泥于字面解释的人吧!这使我想起了克利须那人时的一个故事。每天夜晚他都邀请挤奶女工和他一起在森 林里跳舞。她们来了,她们跳起舞来。夜色深沉,她们中间的火堆呼呼地燃烧着,火焰噼啪作响,音乐的节奏变得越来越快——姑娘们和自己快活的主一起跳啊跳啊 跳啊,他变化出那么多自己,每一位姑娘的怀里都有一个。但是就在姑娘们有了占有欲的时候,就在每一位姑娘都想像他是自己一个人的舞伴的时候,他消失了。因 此我们不应该有独占神的念头。
我在多伦多认识一位我衷心热爱的女人。她是我的养母。我叫她姨妈吉,她喜欢我这么叫她。她是魁北克人。虽然已经在多伦多生活了30多年,她那说法语的大脑 有时候在理解英语发音的时候仍然会出错。因此,当她第一次听到“克利须那派教徒”的时候,她没听准。她听到的是“不留须发的基督教徒”。很多年来她一直以 为克利须那派教徒就是不留须发的基督教徒。我纠正她的时候,告诉她其实她错得不那么严重;就他们爱的能力而言,印度教徒的确是不留须发的基督教徒,正如就 他们认为神存在于一切事物之中的观点而言,穆斯林就是留胡须的印度教徒,而就他们对上帝的忠诚而言,基督教徒就是戴帽子的穆斯林。