If you live in one of four major U.S. cities chances are you're letting the benefits of a ubiquitous natural resource go right down the drain -- when it could be used to cut down your water bill. Research by a team of Drexel University environmental engineers indicates that it rains enough in Philadelphia, New York, Seattle and Chicago that if homeowners had a way to collect and store even just the rain falling on their roofs, they could flush their toilets often without having to use a drop of municipal water. Toilet flushing is the biggest use of water in households in the United States and the United Kingdom,
accounting1 for nearly one-third of potable water use. But there is no reason that clean, treated, municipal water needs to be used to flush a toilet -- rainwater could do the job just as well.
"People have been
catching2 and using rain water for ages, but it's only been in the last 20-30 years that we have realized that this is something that could be done
systematically3 in certain urban areas to ease all different kinds of stresses on
watersheds4; potable water treatment and distribution systems; and urban drainage infrastructure," said Franco Montalto, P.E., PhD, an associate professor in Drexel's College of Engineering, and director of its Sustainable Water Resource Engineering Lab, who led the research effort. "The study looks at four of the largest
metropolitan5 areas in the country to see if it rains enough to make
implementation6 feasible and, if everyone did it, what effect it would have on domestic water demand and stormwater runoff generation in those cities."
The process of collecting and using roof runoff, which researchers call rainwater harvesting, has been working its way into
vogue7 among urban planners and water managers over the last couple decades and has been
implemented8 widely in California in the wake of its water crisis. This study, which started as the graduate thesis of Drexel alumnus Nathan Rostad, was recently published in the journal Resources, Conservation and Recycling, and is one of the first to
crunch9 the numbers and sort out just how feasible, and beneficial, it would be as a way of
offsetting10 potable water use for non-potable purposes while at the same time reducing generation of
undesirable11 urban stormwater runoff.
"When the natural landscape is replaced by a building, rain can no longer
infiltrate12 into the ground," Montalto said. "It runs off, is captured in drains, where it can cause downstream flooding, carry
pollutants13 that settle out of the air into local water bodies or -- in the case of a city like Philadelphia or New York -- cause the
sewer14 to
overflow15, which leads to a discharge of untreated wastewater into local streams and rivers. So capturing rainwater can help to reduce the demands on the water treatment system and ensure that it will still function properly even during heavy rainfall events."
Taking into consideration the cities' annual rainfall patterns,
residential16 population and roof areas, the team calculated that, with enough water storage capacity -- a little more than a standard 1,000-gallon home storage tank -- a three person family in a home with the city's average roof size would have enough water to cover over 80 percent of its flushes throughout the year simply by diverting their downspouts to collect stormwater.