The collapse¹ of the Soviet² Union in 1992 brought an influx³（流入，汇集） of Soviet mathematicians⁵ to U.S. institutions, and those scholars' differing areas of specialization have changed the way math is studied and taught in this country, according to new research by University of Notre Dame⁶ Economist⁷ Kirk Doran and George Borjas from Harvard University. Titled "The Collapse of the Soviet Union and the Productivity of American Mathematicians," the study will appear in an upcoming edition of the Quarterly Journal of Economics.

"In this paper, we examine the impact of the influx of renowned⁸（著名的） Soviet mathematicians into the global mathematics community," says Doran.

"In the period between the establishment and fall of communism, Soviet mathematics developed in an insular⁹（孤立的） fashion and along very different specializations than American mathematics. As a result, some mathematicians experienced few potential insights from Soviet mathematics after the collapse of the Soviet Union, while other fields experienced a flood of new mathematicians, theorems（定理，原理） and ideas."

Between the rise and fall of communism in the Soviet Union (1922-92), there was little collaboration¹⁰ and were few exchanges between Soviet and Western mathematicians. In fact, any communication with American mathematicians was read by authorities and special permission was needed to publish outside the Soviet Union.

"Just as speakers of one language, when separated geographically¹¹ for many generations, develop separate and different dialects through natural changes over time, so Western and Eastern mathematicians, separated by Stalinist and Cold War political institutions, developed under different influences to the point of achieving very different specializations across the fields of mathematics," according to Doran.

Results of the study suggest that the sudden shift in specialized¹² areas not only was related to a decline in the productivity of American mathematicians whose areas of specialty¹³ most overlapped¹⁴ with that of the Soviets¹⁵, but it also reduced the likelihood of a competing American mathematician⁴ producing a top research paper.

Similarly, marginal（边缘的） American mathematicians became much more likely to transfer to lower ranked institutions and to significantly reduce their research and scholarship. There also is evidence in the study that the students of Soviet émigrés（自我移民） had higher lifetime productivity than students from the same institution whose advisers¹⁶ were non-Soviet émigrés.