New theoretical modeling by Carnegie's Alan Boss provides clues to how the gas giant planets in our solar system -- Jupiter and
Saturn1 -- might have formed and evolved. His work was published recently by the Astrophysical Journal.
New stars are surrounded by rotating gas disks during the early stages of their lives. Gas giant planets are thought to form in the presence of these disks.
Observations of young stars that still have these gas disks demonstrate that sun-like stars undergo periodic outbursts,
lasting2 about 100 years, which transfer mass from the disk onto the young star, increasing its
luminosity(光度,光辉). It is thought that these short bursts of mass
accretion3(添加) are driven by marginal gravitational instability in the gas disk.
There are competing theories for how gas giant planets form around proto-suns. One proposes that the planets formed from slowly growing ice and rock cores, followed by rapid accretion of gas from the surrounding disk. The other theory proposes that
clumps4 of
dense5 gas form in spiral arms, increasing in mass and
density6, forming a gas giant planet in a single step.
Boss developed highly
detailed7, three dimensional models demonstrating that regardless of how gas giant planets form, they should have been able to survive periodic outbursts of mass transfer from the gas disk onto the young star. One model similar to our own Solar System was stable for more than 1,000 years, while another model containing planets similar to our Jupiter and Saturn was stable for more than 3,800 years. The models showed that these planets were able to avoid being forced to migrate inward to be swallowed by the growing proto-sun, or being tossed completely out of the planetary system by close encounters with each other.
"Gas giant planets, once formed, can be hard to destroy," said Boss, "even during the energetic outbursts that young stars experience."
Given that searches for
extrasolar(太阳系外的) gas giant planets have found them to be present around about 20% of sun-like stars, this is a
reassuring8 outcome. It suggests that our improved theoretical understanding of the formation and orbital evolution of gas giants is on the right track.