| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A LAWYER in whom an instinct of justice had survived the wreck1 of his ignorance of law was retained for the defence of a burglar whom the police had taken after a desperate struggle with someone not in custody2. In consultation3 with his client the Lawyer asked, "Have you accomplices4?" "Yes, sir," replied the Burglar. "I have two, but neither has been taken. I hired one to defend me against capture, you to defend me against conviction." This answer deeply impressed the Lawyer, and having ascertained5 that the Burglar had accumulated no money in his profession he threw up the case. 点击收听单词发音
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TAG标签:
- 发表评论
-
- 最新评论 进入详细评论页>>