DNA1 results show that shelter workers are often mistaken when they label a dog as a pit bull, with potentially
devastating2 consequences for the dogs, a new University of Florida study has found. "Animal shelter staff and veterinarians are frequently expected to guess the breed of dogs based on appearance alone," said Julie
Levy3, a professor of shelter medicine at the UF College of Veterinary Medicine and the lead author of a study published recently in The Veterinary Journal.
"Unlike many other things people can't quite define but 'know when they see it,' identification of dogs as pit bulls can trigger an array of negative consequences, from the loss of housing, to being seized by animal control, to the taking of the dog's life," she said. "In the high-stakes world of animal shelters, a dog's life might depend on a potential adopter's
momentary4 glimpse and assumptions about its suitability as a pet. If the shelter staff has labeled the dog as a pit bull, its chances for
adoption5 automatically go down in many shelters."
The past few decades have brought an increase in ownership
restrictions6 on breeds including pit bulls and dogs that resemble them. The restrictions are based on assumptions that certain breeds are inherently dangerous, that such dogs can be reliably identified and that the restrictions will improve public safety, the study states.
The study focused on how
accurately7 shelter staff identified dogs believed to be pit bulls. 'Pit bull' is not a recognized breed, but a term
applied8 to dogs
derived9 from the heritage breeds American Staffordshire terrier or Staffordshire bull terrier. The purebred American pit bull terrier is also derived from these breeds and is often included in the loose definition of 'pit bull.'
The research team evaluated breed
assessments10 of 120 dogs made by 16 shelter staff members, including four veterinarians, at four shelters. These staff members all had at least three years of experience working in a shelter environment. The researchers then took blood samples from the dogs, developed DNA profiles for each animal and compared the DNA findings against the staff's initial assessments.
"We found that different shelter staffers who evaluated the same dogs at the same time had only a moderate level of agreement among themselves," Levy said. Results of the study also showed that while limitations in available DNA profiles make absolute breed identification problematic, when visual identification was compared with DNA test results, the assessors in the study fared even worse.