A
lone1 rooster sees a lot of all the hens in the flock, but the hen with the largest comb gets a bigger dose of
sperm2 -- and thus more chicks. This sounds natural, but behind all this is humanity's hunger for eggs. For thousands of years, people have
tinkered with(胡乱地修补) the development of domestic chickens. Through selective breeding for a few characteristics such as large muscle mass and increased egg-laying, we have at the same time caused numerous other
radical3 changes in appearance and behaviour. A research group at Linköping University in Sweden has now shown how the size of a hen's comb is bound up with the ability to lay more eggs. The results have been presented in the scientific journal PLoS Genetics.
Compared with the original wild jungle hen, domestic hens have larger combs as well as
denser5 bones. This influences egg-laying, as the hen's bone tissues provide
calcium6 for the eggshells. The greater the bone mass, the more eggs she can lay.
After having
spotted7 a clear
correlation8 between comb size and bone mass in chickens from a cross between red junglefowl and domestic chicken, the research group -- under the leadership of
evolutionary9 geneticist Dominic Wright -- set up a study where such chickens were crossed for several generations. In this way the genome was split up into smaller and smaller regions, which allowed the "mapping" of the functions of individual
genes10.
In the eighth generation, the researchers found an area that had a strong effect on the weight of the comb -- but also on bone mass and fertility.
The
genetic4 variation has gradually decreased over the course of
domestication11. In domestic chickens there are now some 40 known small regions with stable genes that potentially govern their typical "domestic" characteristics. LiU researchers have now discovered two "pleiotropic" genes: two genes connected to each other that influence several characteristics
simultaneously12. By regulating the production of cartilage, they influence combs (which consist of cartilage throughout) as well as bone growth (where cartilage is the base material) and, ultimately, egg production.
"The original hens have smaller combs, thinner legs, and lay fewer eggs. When people bred for the characteristic of laying many eggs, the comb grew automatically," Dominic Wright says.
In nature, the comb is an example of a sexual
ornament13. Individuals -- often males -- with the most impressive
ornaments14 are favoured by females,
thereby15 obtaining more numerous offspring than their competitors. In
domesticated16 animals, sexual selection -- like natural selection -- has lost its role, as it was humans who determine breeding.