When it comes to solving puzzles, animals in
captivity1 are, well, different animals than their wild
brethren(同胞). Testing animals' ability to solve new problems has been historically conducted on animals in captivity. Only recently has a shift been made to run these tests on animals in their natural habitat. In a study appearing in Animal Behaviour, however, researchers at Michigan State University found vast differences in the problem solving skills between captive and wild
spotted2 hyenas3.
Applying lessons learned from captive animals is potentially problematic because they may not
accurately4 portray5 how wild animals respond to novel challenges, said Sarah Benson-Amram, former MSU
zoology6 graduate student and the study's lead author.
"We have to be careful when interpreting results from captive animals, as there may be extreme differences between how animals behave in captivity and in the wild," said Benson-Amram, who is now a research fellow at the University of St. Andrews (Scotland). "An animal that is successful at solving problems in the comfort of its cage may be
unwilling7 to engage in similar problem-solving behavior in the wild."
Benson-Amram presented wild and captive spotted hyenas with the same novel problem -- a steel puzzle box containing meat. Captive hyenas were significantly better at opening their boxed meals than their wild counterparts. The encaged mammals also were less afraid of the humanmade puzzle, and they also were more creative, trying a variety of solutions.
"It doesn't appear that these differences result from captive hyenas having more time or energy," Benson-Amram said. "We conclude they were more successful because they were more willing to tackle the problem and were more exploratory."
Benson-Amram teamed up with Kay Holekamp, MSU
zoologist8 and co-principal
investigator9 at the
BEACON10 Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, and Mary Weldele with the University of California Berkeley. The research was funded in part by the National Science Foundation.