| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In the global aftershock zone that followed the major April 2012 Indian Ocean earthquake, seismologists noticed an unusual pattern. The magnitude (M) 8.6 earthquake, a strike-slip event at intraoceanic tectonic plates, caused global seismic1 rates of M≥4.5 to rise for several days, even at distances thousands of kilometers from the mainshock site. However, the rate of M≥6.5 seismic activity subsequently dropped to zero for the next 95 days. This period of quiet, without a large quake, has been a rare event in the past century. So why did this period of quiet occur?
In his research presentation, Fred Pollitz of the U.S. Geological Survey suggests that the Indian Ocean earthquake caused short-term dynamic stressing of a global faulting system. Across the planet, there are faults that are "close to failure" and ready to rupture2(破裂). It may be, suggests Pollitz and his colleagues, that a large quake encourages short-term triggering of these close-to-failure faults but also relieves some of the stress that has built up along these faults. Large magnitude events would not occur until tectonic movement loads stress back on to the faults at the ready-to-fail levels they reached before the mainshock.
Using a statistical3 model of global seismicity(地震活动), Pollitz and his colleagues show that a transient(短暂的) seismic perturbation(摄动,不安) of the size of the April 2012 global aftershock would inhibit4 rupture in 88 percent of their possible M≥6.5 earthquake fault sources over the next 95 days, regardless of how close they were to failure beforehand.
点击收听单词发音
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
上一篇:计算美国东海岸的海啸风险 下一篇:鱼类的生命之树 |
TAG标签:
earthquake
quake
aftershock
- 发表评论
-
- 最新评论 进入详细评论页>>