New multi-
scenario1 modelling of world human population has concluded that even
stringent2 fertility
restrictions3 or a catastrophic mass mortality would not bring about large enough change this century to solve issues of global sustainability. Published in the
Proceedings4 of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, ecologists Professor Corey Bradshaw and Professor Barry
Brook5 from the University of Adelaide's Environment Institute say that the "virtually locked-in" population growth means the world must focus on policies and technologies that reverse rising consumption of natural resources and enhance recycling, for more
immediate6 sustainability gains.
Fertility reduction efforts, however, through increased family-planning assistance and education, should still be pursued, as this will lead to hundreds of millions fewer people to feed by mid-century.
"Global population has risen so fast over the past century that roughly 14% of all the human beings that have ever existed are still alive today -- that's a sobering statistic," says Professor Bradshaw, Director of
Ecological7 Modelling in the Environment Institute and School of Earth and Environmental Sciences. "This is considered unsustainable for a range of reasons, not least being able to feed everyone as well as the impact on the climate and environment.
"We examined various
scenarios8 for global human population change to the year 2100 by adjusting fertility and mortality rates to determine the
plausible9 range of population sizes at the end of this century.
"Even a world-wide one-child policy like China's,
implemented10 over the coming century, or catastrophic mortality events like global conflict or a disease pandemic, would still likely result in 5-10 billion people by 2100."
The researchers constructed nine different scenarios for continuing population ranging from "business as usual" through various fertility reductions, to highly unlikely broad-scale
catastrophes11 resulting in billions of deaths.
"We were surprised that a five-year WWIII scenario
mimicking12 the same proportion of people killed in the First and Second World Wars combined, barely registered a blip on the human population
trajectory13 this century," says Professor Barry Brook, Chair of Climate Change at the Environment Institute for this study, and now Professor of Environmental Sustainability at the University of Tasmania.