Q    Thank you, very much, Mr. President.  And greetings from Ghana.  We are looking forward fervently¹（热心地，热忱地） to 2014 --  (laughter) -- for a repeat.  And I recollect² that I was hosting a radio program the day of the match.  And we have a football pundit³ in Ghana -- he doesn’t speak English quite well, but very passionate⁴.  And so I was interviewing him about what the psyche⁵ of our boys should be ahead of the match.  And he said to me, “This is not war, it is football.  If it were to be war, then maybe we should be afraid because the might of America is more than us.”  (Laughter.)  This is football.  They should go out there and be the best that they could be.  And they did.

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, they did an excellent job.  They were a great team.

Q    Mr. President, my question now is that I hear a lot of young African leaders wonder how committed America would be to a partnership⁶.  I hear those who are cynical⁷ about the notion of partnership.  They ask -- and always they ask, partnership?  What kind of fair partnership can exist between a strong and a weak nation?

And so as we prepare ourselves for the future, we ask the same question of America:  How committed is your country to ensuring that the difficult decisions that young people have to make about trade, about agriculture, about support, are made -- to the extent that they may not be in the interest of America?  Because they tell me also that America will protect its interest over and above all else.  Is America committed to ensuring a partnership that might not necessarily be beneficial to America, but truly beneficial to the sovereign interest of the countries that we represent?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, let me say this.  All countries look out for their interests.  So -- and I’m the President of the United States, so my job is to look out for the people of the United States.  That's my job, right?  (Applause.)

Now, I actually think, though, that the interests of the United States and the interests of the continent of Africa greatly overlap⁸.  We have a huge interest in seeing development throughout Africa -- because we are a more mature economy, Africa is a young and growing economy, and if you can buy more iPods and buy more products and buy more services and buy more tractors from us, that we can sell to a fast-growing continent, that creates jobs here in the United States of America.

We have a huge interest in your public health systems because if we’re reducing greatly HIV/AIDS transmissions in Africa, then that will have a positive effect on HIV rates internationally, because of the transmigration of diseases back and forth⁹ in an international world.  And not to mention, if I’m not spending all this money on PEPFAR, that's money I can spend somewhere else.  So I’m going to be incentivized to see Africa do well.  That's in our interest.

And the truth of the matter is, is that whereas with some regions of the world, we do have some genuine conflicts of interest -- let’s say on trade, for example -- the truth is that the United States, we don't have huge conflicts when it comes to trade because, frankly¹⁰, the trade between the United States and Africa is so small, so modest, that very few U.S. companies, U.S. commercial interests are impacted.

That's why AGOA, our trade arrangement with Africa -- we can eliminate tariffs¹¹（关税） and subsidies¹²（补贴，津贴） and allow all sorts of goods to come in partly because you are not our primary competition.

Now, I don't want to pretend that there aren’t ever going to be conflicts.  There will be.  There’s going to be difference in world views.  There are going to be some agricultural products where there are certain interests in the United States or there are certain interests in Europe that want to prevent those from coming in, even though, in the aggregate¹³（总计，总共） , it would not have a huge impact on the U.S. economy.  And so there are going to be occasional areas of tension.  But overall, the reason you should have confidence that we want a partnership is because your success will enhance our position rather than reduce it.

Also Africa has some of our most loyal friends.  Every survey that's taken, when you ask what continent generally has the most positive views about America, it turns out Africa generally has a positive view of America and positive experiences.  So I think that you should feel confident even if I’m not President that the American people genuinely want to see Africa succeed.

What the American people don't want is to feel like their efforts at helping¹⁴ are wasted.  So if at a time of great constraint¹⁵（结束，局促） , we are coming up with aid, those aid dollars need to go to countries that are actually using them effectively.  And if they're not using them effectively, then they should go to countries that are.

And one of the things that I’ve said to my development team is I want us to have high standards in terms of performance and evaluation¹⁶ when we have these partnerships¹⁷ -- because a partnership is a two-way street.  It means that, on the one hand, we’re accountable to you and that we have to listen to you and make sure that any plans that we have, have developed indigenously¹⁸（该土地所固有） .  On the other hand, it also means you’re accountable.  So you can’t just say, give me this, give me that, and then if it turns out that it’s not working well, that's not your problem.  Right?  It has to be a two-way street.

Okay, looks like this side has not gotten a question here.  So how about this gentleman right here.

Q    Thank you, Mr. President -- I'm from Zimbabwe.  Currently our government is in a transition between the former ruling party Zanu PF and the Movement for Democratic Change.  And within this same context, Zimbabwe is currently under restrictive measures, especially for those who are party in line with Robert Mugabe under the ZIDERA Act.  How has been the success of ZIDERA -- the formation of the inclusive（包括的，包含的） government?  Because in Zimbabwe, Robert Mugabe is still using the rhetoric¹⁹ （修辞）of sanctions, racist²⁰, property rights abuse, human rights abuse, in violation²¹ to the rule of law.  How has been the success of that towards the implementation²² -- the success or the growth of young people?

THE PRESIDENT:  Well, you probably have a better answer than me.  So you should be sharing with our team what you think would make the most sense.  I’ll be honest with you -- I’m heartbroken when I see what’s happened in Zimbabwe.  I think Mugabe is an example of a leader who came in as a liberation fighter and -- I’m just going to be very blunt（不锋利的，直率的） -- I do not see him serving his people well.  And the abuses, the human rights abuses, the violence that's been perpetrated against opposition²³ leaders I think is terrible.

Now, Changerai has tried to work -- despite the fact that he himself has been beaten and imprisoned²⁴, he has now tried to work to see if there is a gradual transition that might take place.  But so far, the results have not been what we had hoped.

And this always poses a difficult question for U.S. foreign policy because, on the one hand, we don't want to punish the people for the abuses of a leader; on the other hand, we have very little leverage²⁵ other than saying, if there are just systematic²⁶ abuses by a government, we are not going to deal with them commercially, we’re not going to deal with them politically, in ways that we would with countries that are observing basic human rights principles.

And so there have been discussions when I’ve traveled with leaders in the Southern African region about whether or not sanctions against Zimbabwe are or are not counterproductive（反生产的，反效果的） .  I will tell you I would love nothing more than to be able to open up greater diplomatic relationships and economic and commercial relationships with Zimbabwe.  But in order to do so, we’ve got to see some signal that it will not simply entrench²⁷ the same past abuses but rather will move us in a new direction that actually helps the people.

And Zimbabwe is a classic example of a country that should be the breadbasket for an entire region.  It’s a spectacular country.  Now, it had to undergo a transition from white minority rule that was very painful and very difficult.  But they have chosen a path that's different than the path that South Africa chose.

South Africa has its problems, but from what everybody could see during the World Cup, the potential for moving that country forward as a multiracial, African democracy that can succeed on the world stage, that's a model that so far at least Zimbabwe has not followed.  And that's where I’d like to see it go.  All right?

How much more time do I have, guys?  Last question?  I’m sorry -- last question.  Last question.  No, it’s a young lady’s turn.  This one right here.