| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Ministry1 of Health has been given primary responsibility for food safety supervision2 under the latest draft of the legislation that was submitted yesterday for its second reading to the National People's Congress Standing3 Committee. The ministry will also shoulder a range of new tasks including risk evaluation4, standard setting, accident investigation5 and information release, the draft of the food safety law said. Chen Junshi, a senior researcher with the National Institute for Nutrition and Food Safety, said yesterday that while the draft draws clearer lines on responsibility, it fails to tackle the problems with the supervision mechanism6. Currently, at least six government departments are involved with food safety and this leads to overlapping7 of responsibilities and causes problems with law enforcement, he said. Chen praised the decision to give overall responsibility for supervision to the health ministry, as responsibility currently lies with the State Food and Drug Administration (SFDA), which has only vice-ministerial status. "It's impossible for a vice-ministerial department to coordinate8 ministries," he said. "So things may get better after the change." However, the draft fails to reform the supervision process, he said. "If this mechanism is not changed, the supervision won't be effective, as coordination9 among the various government agencies will remain difficult," Chen said. Under the new draft, the Ministry of Agriculture retains supervision of farm produce, while quality supervision authorities keep responsibility for food processing and industry and commerce departments for food circulation. This is the first time the draft has made such clear stipulations. The draft also includes the transfer of responsibility for food safety in the catering10 sector11 from the health ministry to the SFDA. Chen said that while it is difficult to reform the current supervision mechanism, because it will affect the interests of some government departments, the ideal situation is to have a single department responsible for the entire food safety supervision chain, as is the case in the United States. "The State Council's institutional restructuring in March and the ongoing12 food safety legislation are both good attempts at making changes, but both have failed, so there is still resistance," he said. Regardless of the debate, the second draft is unlikely to be passed at this week's NPC session, as Legislation Law states that drafts usually receive three readings before being adopted. Li Yuan, director of the administrative13 law division of the NPC Standing Committee's legislative14 affairs commission, said the revisions are based on the reform plans of the central government departments involved, and that they had been passed by the State Council. A source told China Daily that the health ministry's reform plan includes a name change for its sanitation15 supervision bureau to "food safety coordination and sanitation supervision bureau", and that a food safety evaluation committee will be set up. The reform plan of the SFDA requires the establishment of two new departments: one for food admission and the other for food safety supervision.
Questions: 1. Some researchers think the new legislation fails to tackle problems in which area? 2. Which department is now primarily responsible for food safety? 3. Which department will retain supervision of farm produce? Answers: 1. The supervision mechanism . 2. The Ministry of Health . 3. The Ministry of Agriculture. 点击收听单词发音
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- 发表评论
-
- 最新评论 进入详细评论页>>