Bill Haywood Trial(英)

  The struggle between the Western Federation¹ of Miners and the Western Mine Owners' Association at the turn of the twentieth century might well be called a "war." When the state of Idaho prosecuted² William "Big Bill" Haywood in 1907 for ordering the assassination³ of former governor Frank Steunenberg, fifteen years of union bombings and murders, fifteen years of mine owner intimidation⁴ and greed, and fifteen years of government abuse of process and denials of liberties spilled into the national headlines. Featuring James McParland, America's most famous detective; Harry⁵ Orchard⁶, America's most notorious mass murderer turned state's witness; Big Bill Haywood, America's most radical⁷ labor⁸ leader; and Clarence Darrow, America's most famous defense⁹ attorney, the Haywood trial ranks as one of the most fascinating criminal trials in history.

    In the early evening of December 30, 1905, Frank Steunenberg, returning from a walk in eight inches of freshly fallen snow, opened an in-swinging gate leading to the porch of his Caldwell, Idaho home, and was blown ten feet into the air by an explosion that "shook the earth and could be heard for miles around." Within an hour, Steunenberg, the former governor of Idaho, was dead. Speculation¹⁰ began immediately that Steunenberg's assassination was the work of the Western Federation of Miners (WFM), whose enmity Steunenberg had earned by his aggressive efforts, including the requesting of federal troops, to suppress labor unrest in the Couer d'Alene mining region of northern Idaho.

    The 1890's had been a time of unprecedented¹¹ violence in Idaho's silver mines. Federal troops were called to Idaho three separate times to combat union-sponsored terrorism that had resulted in many deaths and extensive property damage to mining company property, the last time being an eighteen-month occupation from May, 1898 to November, 1899 undertaken at the urging of Governor Frank Steunenberg. Steunenberg asked President McKinley to send troops after union miners hijacked¹² a train and planted sixty boxes of dynamite¹³ beneath the world's largest concentrator, owned by the Bunker Hill Mining Company of Wardner, Idaho, blowing it and several nearby buildings to smithereens. Federal troops responded by arresting every male-- even doctors and preachers-- in union-controlled towns, loading them into boxcars, and herding¹⁴ them into an old barn where the over 1,000 men were held captive without trial. In declaring martial¹⁵ law, Steunenberg said, "We have taken the monster by the throat and we are going to choke the life out of it. No halfway¹⁶ measures will be adopted. It is a plain case of the state or the union winning, and we do not propose that the state shall be defeated." Steunenberg's tough anti-union stance infuriated leaders of the Western Federation of Miners, all the more so because he was a Democrat¹⁸ who miners helped elect.

    The day after Steunenberg's assassination, a waitress at the Saratoga Hotel in Caldwell reported that a guest, calling himself Thomas Hogan, had "trembling hands" and "downcast eyes" when she waited on him shortly after the explosion. A search of Hogan's hotel room turned up traces of plaster of Paris, the substance used to hold pieces of the bomb together, in his chamber¹⁹ pot. Hogan was questioned about the bombing and, the next day (New Year's Day, 1906) arrested while having a drink in the hotel bar and charged with the first degree murder of Frank Steunenberg. Interrogated²⁰ repeatedly in a Caldwell jail, Hogan disclosed that his name was Harry Orchard, and that he knew leaders of the WFM, though he continued to deny both his own guilt²¹ and any recent contact with Federation insiders.

    No one in Idaho believed that Steunenberg's assassination was the work of just one man. The Governor of Idaho contacted the The Pinkerton Detective Agency for help in coordinating²² the murder investigation²³. The Pinkertons sent to Boise to head the effort their most famous employee and America's premier²⁴ detective, James McParland. McParland had made his reputation some thirty years earlier, working undercover in Pennsylvania's anthracite coal mining region to expose and convict a secret gang of Irish thugs, the Molly Maguires. McParland's fame was great enough to attract the interest of the author Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, who invented a meeting of Sherlock Holmes and McParland in The Valley of Fear, an unprecedented honor for a real detective.

    McParland, visiting Orchard in the state penitentiary²⁵ near Boise, suggested to the suspected killer²⁶ that he was likely to receive more lenient²⁷ treatment if he was willing to become a witness for the state and help convict WFM leaders, who were the target of the state's real anger. Within days, Orchard, after breaking down and crying several times, offered one of the most amazing confessions²⁹ in the annals of American justice. In his 64-page confession²⁸, Orchard admitted both to the Steunenberg bombing and seventeen other killings³¹ all, he said, ordered by the inner circle of the WFM. WFM Secretary-Treasurer William Haywood, President Charles Moyer, and close advisor³² George Pettibone were all specifically accused of ordering the Steunenberg assassination. Orchard also identified three other WFM miners who he said had been his accomplices³³ in various acts of union terrorism.

    With Orchard's confession in hand, McParland proceeded to devise a plan to arrest the three members of the WFM inner circle, all living in the WFM's headquarters city of Denver, and transport them to Idaho for trial. McParland wanted the arrest and trip north to be so surreptitious and swift that the men would have no opportunity to obtain the assistance of lawyers who might prepare legal challenges to extradition³⁴. In effect, what McParland proposed was a kidnapping under the barest color of state law. McParland and Idaho state officials succeeded in convincing the governor of Colorado to issue warrants for the arrest of the three men (codenamed Copperhead, Viper³⁵, and Rattler) on February 15, 1906, though both the warrants and the planned arrests remained a closely guarded secret until the night of February 17, when the three were rounded up (Moyer was arrested after boarding "the Deadwood Sleeper³⁶" which was to take him to South Dakota on the first leg of a probable planned escape to Canada; Haywood was arrested while having sex with his sister-in-law). Haywood, Moyer, and Pettibone were placed for a few hours in the city jail, denied permission to call family or lawyers, before being hustled³⁷ in the early hours of the morning to the Denver depot³⁸ and placed on a special train with orders not to stop until it crossed the Idaho border.

    Not long after the special train departed the Denver station, Edmund Richardson, the longtime attorney for the WFM, boarded another train to Idaho and began the legal battle to free the three leaders. Richardson filed petitions for habeas corpus, arguing that their forcible removal from Colorado without an opportunity to legally challenge their arrest and extradition in Colorado courts violated the Constitution. The prisoners' arguments lost both in the Idaho courts and the United States Supreme³⁹ Court, which in December of 1906 in the case of Pettibone v. Nichols, ruled that a prisoner was "not excused from answering to the state whose laws he has violated because violence has been done to him in bringing him within the state."  Justice McKenna was the sole dissenter⁴⁰, writing: "Kidnapping is a crime, pure and simple. All of the officers of the state are supposed to be on guard against it. But how is it when the law becomes a kidnapper⁴¹? When the officers of the law, using it forms, and exerting its power, become abductors?"

    Haywood, Moyer, and Pettibone took their fates differently. Moyer was frequently observed crying or walking nervously⁴² around his cell. Haywood used his time in jail to design new WFM posters, take a correspondence course in law, read books such as Upton Sinclair's The Jungle, and run on the Socialist⁴³ ticket for governor of Colorado (he received 16,000 votes). Pettibone took his incarceration⁴⁴ on death row almost cheerfully, shouting "There's luck in odd numbers, said Barney McGraw!" Over the months of their detention⁴⁵, tensions grew between the radical and defiant⁴⁶ Haywood and the more cautious Moyer. Soon they were no longer on speaking terms and McParland began efforts, ultimately unsuccessful, to convince Moyer to testify against the other two defendants⁴⁸.

    Meanwhile, McParland continue to hunt down other witnesses who could strengthen the prosecution⁴⁹'s case. A miner named Steve Adams, implicated⁵⁰ by Orchard in the bombing of a Colorado train depot that killed thirteen non-union miners and the killing³⁰ of two claim jumpers in northern Idaho, was arrested. Threats of hanging and promises of immunity⁵¹ finally induced Adams to confess.

    In December of 1906, after the Supreme Court's ruling in the Pettibone case, Clarence Darrow, famed Chicago defense attorney, was hired to work with Richardson in preparing the case for the defense of Bill Haywood, the first of the three prisoners who would face trial. Darrow's first priority, after arriving in Idaho, was to convince Adams to withdraw his confession and thus make the state's case against Haywood stand on the uncorroborated testimony⁵³ of Harry Orchard. Denied personal access to the closely held Adams, Darrow was able to convey, through an uncle of Adams, assurances of free counsel (and perhaps other financial rewards as well) should he repudiate⁵⁴ his confession. Much to McParland's chagrin⁵⁵, Adams did repudiate his confession and was as a result shipped to Wallace, Idaho to face old murder charges. Darrow defended Adams in a February, 1907 trial that ended in a hung jury.

    The prosecution was assembling its own star-studded line-up for the Haywood trial. One of the two lead prosecutors⁵⁷ was William Borah (who, later as member of the United States Senate would be a leading voice for the Progressive Republicans). Borah, known for his shrewd strategizing and forceful oratory⁵⁸, had the biggest and most profitable legal practice in the state. Borah was joined by James Hawley, a stereotypical⁵⁹ western lawyer, renowned⁶⁰ for his rapport⁶¹ with Idaho juries and the state's most experienced trial attorney.

    THE TRIAL

    On May 9, 1907 the case of State of Idaho versus⁶² William D. Haywood was called for trial in Judge Fremont Wood's third-floor courtroom of the Ada County Courthouse. Press reports that day from Boise announced that "the eyes of the civilized⁶³ world are on these great proceedings," which was described as a "determined⁶⁴ struggle between labor unions and capital." One reporter called the Haywod trial "the greatest trial of modern time," while another described it as "one of the great court cases in the annals of the American judiciary." In a front row bench, much like an old-fashioned church pew, sat Haywood's wife, daughters, and mother, all of whom had been asked by Darrow to attend the trial so as to help create sympathy for his client.

    Jury selection proved a difficult and time-consuming task, with 249 potential jurors questioned over more than six weeks to arrive at the final panel of twelve. Both sides understood the importance of having a favorable jury in a case with the political implications of the Haywood trial. Each side had invested great resources in compiling intelligence on members of the local jury pool. Men were sent out into Boise and the surrounding countryside posing as encyclopedia⁶⁵ and insurance salesman, with the purpose of investigating the affiliations⁶⁶, politics, and preferences of any who might be called for jury duty. The Pinkertons managed to place a spy, Operative 21, as a jury canvasser⁶⁷ for the defense with the instruction to provide Darrow and the defense team with erroneous reports of the preferences of potential jurors. (Only late in the jury selection game did the defense uncover the spy in their midst.) Many potential jurors resisted serving on a jury for $3 a day for what promised to be a long and controversial trial, and some ran from the sheriff as he tried to round up potential jurors. Some took off for the hills, while others were found hiding in cellars and haystacks. Once in court, potential jurors were asked about what they thought of labor unions, what church they belonged to, and whether they heard a speech recently delivered in Boise by Secretary Howard Taft. Both sides weighed the answers of potential jurors and exercised peremptory⁶⁸ challenges or challenges for cause against those they saw as unsuitable jurors. Bill Haywood huddled⁶⁹ with his lawyers, seemingly taking an active role in the jury selection process. Finally, jury selection was completed with the addition to the jury of a rancher named O. V. Sebern. Of the twelve jurors, nine were ranchers or farmers, one was a real estate agent, one a construction foreman, and one a building contractor⁷¹. Eleven of the twelve were men over fifty.

    James Hawley gave the prosecution's opening statement. Hawley's attempts to describe Steunenberg's murder and the confession of Orchard were repeatedly objected to by Darrow, who called his statements argument rather than an outline of the proposed evidence as the rules for opening statements call for. Darrow's interruptions and frequent sarcastic⁷² editorializing seemed to fluster⁷³ Hawley, and most reporters rated the opening statement weak. Darrow opted¹⁷ to postpone⁷⁴ his own opening statement until the close of the prosecution case.

    The first set of witnesses called by the state described events in Caldwell on December 30, 1905. The group included a neighbor of Steunenberg who heard the explosion, a doctor who attended Stuenenberg at his deathbed, a Caldwell resident who witnessed Orchard observing the Steunenberg residence with binoculars⁷⁵, another resident who observed Orchard leaving the Saratoga Hotel shortly before the explosion and, finally, Steunenberg's son Julian, who once had a conversation with Orchard during which he was said to have asked about the possibility of buying sheep from his father. Then the state called the witness everyone was waiting to hear.

    "Call Harry Orchard." The prosecution considered it something of a victory to present a live Harry Orchard, after months of rumors⁷⁶ that the WFM was planning to poison him in jail or shoot him on the way to the courthouse. The rumors were taken seriously. Hawley sent word to the defense that "the second man shot will be Darrow." Orchard took the stand, wearing a tweed suit and a neat mustache, he was described by one reporter as "looking like a Sunday school superintendent⁷⁷."

    Before Orchard could begin to tell his remarkable⁷⁸ tale of his career as a union terrorist, Hawley had some preliminary questions:

    "Is Harry Orchard your real name?"

    "No, sir."

    "How long have you used the name of Harry Orchard?"

    "About eleven years."

    "What is your real name?"

    "Albert E. Horsley."

    With a strong, steady delivery, Orchard told his story to a packed courtroom (with hundreds of spectators unable to find seats milling around on the courthouse lawn). Orchard said he was born in Ontario, Canada forty years earlier, left for the U.S. at age thirty, eventually finding work as a mucker in a Burke, Idaho silver mine, where he joined the WFM. On April 29, 1898, Orchard was, he said, one of the thousand or so miners who hijacked a Northern Pacific train, diverted it to Wardner, then blew up the Bunker Hill concentrator, killing two men:

    "Who lit the fuse?"

    "I lit one of them. I don't know who lit the rest."

    Orchard testified that he evaded⁷⁹ arrest by hiding out in the hills above Burke, then making his way to Butte, Montana which was then the headquarters of the WFM. His career as a union killer began in 1903 when he blew up the Vindicator⁸⁰ mine in Colorado for $500, killing two. In 1904, he dynamited⁸¹ the train depot in Independence, Colorado, killing thirteen non-union miners. Later, under orders of Haywood and Pettibone, Orchard said that he attempted assassinations⁸² of the governor of Colorado, two Colorado Supreme Court justices, and the president of a mining company. The attempts all failed, although one bomb intended for a justice killed an innocent bystander instead. Orchard testified that he was the fifth man hired by Haywood, Moyer, and Pettibone to assassinate⁸³ Steunenberg. He testified that when he was hired Haywood said to him, "Steunenberg has lived seven years too long." His reward for a successful job was to be several hundred dollars and a ranch⁷⁰. The purpose of the Steunenberg assassination, according to Orchard, was to strike fear in any politician who might consider actions that would frustrate⁸⁴ WFM goals.

    Edmund Richardson cross-examined Orchard for the defense, after winning a battle with Darrow for the honor. For twenty-six hours, Richardson subjected Orchard to a threatening, loud, and insulting attack covering every detail of his confession. The cross-examination succeeded only in emphasizing his testimony through repetition. Richardson attempted to damage Orchard's credibility by showing him to be a womanizer, a man who deserted⁸⁵ his family, a bigamist, a heavy drinker, a gambler, and a cheat. He was drilled about his indifference⁸⁶ to the damage and destruction he inflicted⁸⁷. Through it all, Orchard stood up well. Richardson suggested that Orchard took the stand only to save his own life:

    "So you thought you could make your peace with the future by having someone else hanged, did you?"

    "No, sir. No, sir. [Orchard was sobbing⁸⁸ at this point.] I had no thought of getting out of it, by laying it on anybody else. I began to think about my own life and the unnatural⁸⁹ monster I had been."

    When Orchard finally left the stand, the reporter for Collier's called him "the most remarkable witness that ever appeared in an American court of justice."

    The state concluded its case by introducing articles from a WFM publication, Miner's Magazine, that revealed a deep hatred⁹⁰ of Steunenberg and sardonic⁹¹ pleasure over his passing, some letters received by Orchard, and presenting an African-American witness who claimed to have seen Orchard and Haywood together in a buggy. The defense asked for a directed verdict when the prosecution rested, but Judge Wood ruled that he was "thoroughly⁹² satisfied that the case should be submitted to a jury."

    The defense called nearly a hundred witnesses to refute various points of Orchard's confession or cast doubt on his motives⁹⁴. Among those called was Morris Friedman, Pinkerton Detective James McParland's private stenographer⁹⁵ and author of a book, Pinkerton Labor Spy. Friedman described dirty tricks used by the Pinkertons to subvert⁹⁶ the WFM, including the use of undercover operatives within the WFM who padded bills to drain the Federation treasury⁹⁷ and reduced payments to miners to build dissatisfaction with Haywood. The purpose of the testimony was to suggest to jurors that Pinkerton infiltrators may have committed some of the crimes Orchard attributed to the WFM in order to bring the labor organization into disrepute. Charles Moyer and George Pettibone also testified and denied many of Orchard's specific allegations about their complicity in crimes.

    On July 11, 1907, Darrow called William Haywood. Spectators fanned themselves with palm-leaf fans in ninety-five degree heat as Haywood, in a mild-mannered, soft-spoken, conversational⁹⁸ tone, denied charge after charge that had been leveled against him by Harry Orchard. He denied ordering Orchard to blow up any mine or assassinate Steunenberg or any other public official. One reporter, no fan of Haywood, wrote in admiration⁹⁹ of Haywood's "manly¹⁰⁰ assertion of his principles." Senator Borah cross-examined Haywood for the prosecution. As Borah stood to begin his questioning, Haywood fixed¹⁰¹ his single eye (the other had been lost in a childhood accident) on the prosecutor⁵⁶. Borah was to say later that Haywood's glare "doubled me up like a jack-knife." For five hours, Borah tried and failed to crack the imposing¹⁰² defendant⁴⁷.

    J. Anthony Lukas, Pulitzer Prize winning author of the magnificent book about the Haywood case, Big Trouble, wrote that "rarely in the nation's first century and a quarter had a courtroom harbored four attorneys of such distinction as Hawley, Borah, Richardson, and Darrow." There summations¹⁰⁴ were, at a time when courtroom theater was a popular form of entertainment, greatly anticipated, and their performances did not disappoint.

    Hawley summed up first for the prosecution, chatting with the jury in the informal way for which he was famous. Hawley said the prosecution asked only for justice, then reminded them of that December day when Steunenberg was "sent to face his God without a moment's warning and within sight of his wife and children." In Orchards's confession, Hawley saw "divine grace working upon his soul and through him to bring justice to one of the worst criminal bands that ever operated in this country."

    Richardson offered the defense's first summation¹⁰³. In a nine-hour address full of theatrics and flourishes, Richardson asked jurors to determine Haywood's guilt "under the high dome¹⁰⁵ of heaven." He reminded juror's of Steunenberg's 1899 crackdown on northern Idaho miners and the resulting incarceration of miners in "bullpens" by federal "colored troops:"

    "They threw them in the dirty, vile-kept bullpens and they were subjected to all sorts of indignities¹⁰⁶ and insults at the hands of those negro soldiers. If you had been there...gentleman of the jury, it is certain that you would have attained¹⁰⁷ in your breast a righteous hatred for every person who had anything to do with causing your humiliation¹⁰⁸ and suffering."

    Richardson argued that the angry words about Steunenberg in Miner's Magazine were understandable given the events of seven years earlier. Blame for Steunenberg's murder, however, Richardson laid on Orchard and the Pinkertons. Richardson suggested it was odd that an assassin like Orchard would make himself known around Caldwell, fail to destroy incriminating evidence, and be called "Harry" by prosecutors. The murder, he suggested, was a frame-up planned by the Pinkertons to discredit¹⁰⁹ and ultimately destroy the leadership of the WFM.

    As impressive as the first two summations were, Hawley and Richardson were, in the words of Anthony Lukas, "a bit like vaudeville¹¹⁰ artists who warmed up the crowd for the top bananas," Darrow and Borah. Darrow closed for the defense with an eleven-hour speech that at times, had Haywood's wife and mother and many of the women in the courtroom sobbing.

    Darrow pitilessly attacked Orchard, who he called "the biggest liar¹¹¹ that this generation has known." Any juror "who would take away the life of a human being upon testimony like that [of Orchard's] would place a stain upon the state of his nativity...that all the waters of the great seas could never wash away." In a move much criticized in the press, Darrow both admitted and excused much of the violence attributed to the WFM:

    "I don't mean to tell this jury that labor organizations do no wrong. I know them too well for that. They do wrong often, and sometimes brutally¹¹²; they are sometimes cruel; they are often unjust; they are frequently corrupt¹¹³. . .But I am here to say that in a great cause these labor organizations, despised and weak and outlawed¹¹⁴ as they generally are, have stood for the poor, they have stood for the weak, they have stood for every human law that was ever placed upon the statute¹¹⁵ books. They stood for human life, they stood for the father who was bound down by his task, they stood for the wife, threatened to be taken from the home to work by his side, and they have stood for the little child who was also taken to work in their places--that the rich could grow richer still, and they have fought for the right of the little one, to give him a little of life, a little comfort while he is young. I don't care how many wrongs they committed, I don't care how many crimes these weak, rough, rugged¹¹⁶, unlettered men who often know no other power but the brute¹¹⁷ force of their strong right arm, who find themselves bound and confined and impaired¹¹⁸ whichever way they turn, who look up and worship the god of might as the only god that they know--I don't care how often they fail, how many brutalities they are guilty of. I know their cause is just."

    Darrow offered a different motive⁹³ for Orchard's murder than the one suggested by his co-counsel. He argued (unconvincingly, as far as the press was concerned) that Orchard bore a personal grudge¹¹⁹ against Steunenberg because the governor's intervention¹²⁰ in northern Idaho resulting in him losing a share of a silver mine. Finally, Darrow launched into a powerful conclusion that ranks among the best of his long career:

    I have known Haywood. I have known him well and I believe in him. I do believe in him. God knows it would be a sore day to me if he should ascend¹²¹ the scaffold; the sun would not shine or the birds would not sing on that day for me. It would be a sad day indeed if any calamity¹²² should befall him. I would think of him, I would think of his mother, I would think of his babes, I would think of the great cause that he represents. It would be a sore day for me.

    But, gentlemen, he and his mother, his wife and his children are not my chief concern in this case. If you should decree that he must die, ten thousand men will work down in the mines to send a portion of the proceeds of their labor to take care of that widow and those orphan¹²³ children, and a million people throughout the length and the breadth of the civilized world will send their messages of kindness and good cheer to comfort them in their bereavement¹²⁴. It is not for them I plead.

    Other men have died, other men have died in the same cause in which Bill Haywood has risked his life, men strong with devotion, men who love liberty, men who love their fellow men have raised their voices in defense of the poor, in defense of justice, have made their good fight and have met death on the scaffold, on the rack, in the flame and they will meet it again until the world grows old and gray. Bill Haywood is no better than the rest. He can die if die he needs, he can die if this jury decrees it; but, oh, gentlemen, don't think for a moment that if you hang him you will crucify the labor movement of the world.

    Don't think that you will kill the hopes and the aspirations¹²⁵ and the desires of the weak and the poor, you men, unless you people who are anxious for this blood--are you so blind as to believe that liberty will die when he is dead? Do you think there are no brave hearts and no other strong arms, no other devoted¹²⁶ souls who will risk their life in that great cause which has demanded martyrs¹²⁷ in every age of this world? There are others, and these others will come to take his place, will come to carry the banner where he could not carry it.

    Gentlemen, it is not for him alone that I speak. I speak for the poor, for the weak, for the weary, for that long line of men who in darkness and despair have borne the labors¹²⁸ of the human race. The eyes of the world are upon you, upon you twelve men of Idaho tonight. Wherever the English language is spoken, or wherever any foreign tongue known to the civilized world is spoken, men are talking and wondering and dreaming about the verdict of these twelve men that I see before me now. If you kill him, your act will be applauded by many. If you should decree Bill Haywood's death, in the great railroad offices of our great cities men will applaud your names. If you decree his death, amongst the spiders of Wall Street will go up paeans¹²⁹ of praise for those twelve good men and true who killed Bill Haywood. In every bank in the world, where men hate Haywood because he fights for the poor and against the accursed system upon which the favored live and grow rich and fat--from all those you will receive blessings¹³⁰ and unstinted praise.

    But if your verdict should be "Not Guilty," there are still those who will reverently¹³¹ bow their heads and thank these twelve men for the life and the character they have saved. Out on the broad prairies where men toil¹³² with their hands, out on the wide ocean where men are tossed and buffeted¹³³ on the waves, through our mills and factories, and down deep under the earth, thousands of men and of women and children, men who labor, men to suffer, women and children weary with care and toil, these men and these women and these children will kneel tonight and ask their God to guide your judgment¹³⁴. These men and these women and these little children, the poor, the weak, and the suffering of the world will stretch out their hands to this jury, and implore¹³⁵ you to save Haywood's life.

    The final words belonged to the prosecution and Senator Borah. Borah told the jury that this "is simply a trial for murder," not an attack on organized labor. He asked the jury to consider Orchard's actions, not just his words, especially his frequent trips to Denver: "Why? Why always back to Denver? Unless it was to find there the protection and pay of his employers." Borah closed by reminding jurors of their solemn duty:

    "I remembered again the awful thing of December 30, 1905, a night which has taken ten years to the life of some who are in this courtroom now. I felt again its cold and icy chill, faced the drifting snow and peered at last into the darkness for the sacred spot where last lay the body of my dead friend, and saw true, only too true, the stain of his life's blood upon the whitened earth. I saw Idaho dishonored and disgraced. I saw murder--no, not murder, a thousand times worse than murder--I saw anarchy¹³⁶ wave its first bloody¹³⁷ triumph in Idaho. And as I thought again I said, 'Thou living God, can the talents or the arts of counsel unteach the lessons of that hour?' No, no. Let us be brave, let us be faithful in this supreme test of trial and duty...If the defendant is entitled to his liberty, let him have it. But, on the other hand, if the evidence in this case discloses the author of this crime, then there is no higher duty to be imposed upon citizens than the faithful discharge of that particular duty. Some of you men have stood the test and trial in the protection of the American flag. But you never had a duty imposed upon you which required more intelligence, more manhood, more courage than that which the people of Idaho assign to you this night in the final discharge of your duty."

    Judge Wood gave the jury their instructions. He told them the defendant was presumed innocent, that proof of guilt must be established beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the jury could not convict without corroborated⁵² evidence that connected Haywood with the Steunenberg assassination. At 11:04 am on Saturday, July 28, 1907, the twelve jurors began their deliberations.

    As deliberations continued through the night, rumors of the jury's thinking began to swirl¹³⁸ around Boise. Most rumors had it that the jury was 11 to 1 or 10 to 2 or 9 to 3 for conviction. Darrow seemed to be pinning his hope on a hung jury. After deliberating through the night, the jury at 6:40 am on Sunday morning reported that they had reached a verdict.

    As the jury filed into Judge Wood's courtroom, Darrow put an arm around his client and said, " Bill, old man, you'd better prepare for the worst. I'm afraid it's against us, so keep up your nerve." Haywood replied, "Yes, I will." The clerk of court, Otto Peterson, announced the verdict: "We the jury in the above entitled cause find the defendant, William D. Haywood, not guilty." Haywood jumped up, laughing and crying, bear hugged friends, then rushed to the jury to shake hands with as many members of it as he could.

    EPILOGUE

    Interviews with jurors after the trial hint at several reasons for their surprising verdict--reached six ballots¹³⁹ after an initial vote of 8 for acquittal, 2 for conviction, and 2 abstentions. Some jurors suggested that Judge Wood's instructions requiring corroboration¹⁴⁰ of Orchard's testimony dictated¹⁴¹ the result. If so, the defense's success in persuading Steve Adams, by bribe¹⁴² or threat or whatever, to withdraw his confession was the key to victory. Other jurors expressed their positive impression of Haywood on the witness stand. Still others credited Darrow's moving summation. Members of the press offered other speculations¹⁴³ as well, suggesting that fear of reprisals¹⁴⁴ by the WFM may have persuaded some jurors to vote for acquittal. At least one Pinkerton detective offered an even darker explanation: that at least one of the jurors was bought.

    George Pettibone was next up for trial. Harry Orchard was the state's star witness. This time his cross-examination was handled by Darrow who according to one observer, caused the jury to turn from Orchard as they would "from the carcass of a dead animal." The Pettibone jury acquitted¹⁴⁵ him in much less time than it took the Haywood jury to reach its verdict. Charges against Charles Moyer were dropped after the Pettibone trial.

    Bill Haywood became the leader of the Industrial Workers of the World (the "Wobblies"). In 1918, Haywood was tried under an espionage¹⁴⁶ and sedition¹⁴⁷ act for urging a strike in a war-sensitive industry, was convicted and sentenced to thirty years in prison. In 1921, while out on bond pending¹⁴⁸ appeal, Haywood jumped bond and fled to the Soviet¹⁴⁹ Union, where he was to become a confidant of the Bolsheviks and a friend to John Reed. Haywood died in Moscow in 1928. Half of his ashes were buried in the Kremlin near those of Reed, and the other half were shipped to Chicago for burial near a monument to the Haymarket rioters whose actions in 1886 inspired Haywood's life of radicalism¹⁵⁰.

    Harry Orchard was tried and convicted of the murder of Frank Steunenberg. He was sentenced to death, but his sentence was later commuted¹⁵¹ to life in prison. He remained in the Idaho state penitentiary near Boise, raising chickens and growing strawberries as a prison trusty, until his death in 1954.

    The trials of Haywood and Pettibone roughly marked the end of the fifteen year labor war in the western mines, a period which approached nearer than any other in American history to open class warfare¹⁵². Anthony Lukas wrote in Big Trouble:

    Finally, the opposing camps in this nasty class war sputtering¹⁵³ along the icy ridges¹⁵⁴ of the Rocky Mountains had just about canceled each other out. Operative for operative, hired gun for hired gun, bought juror for bought juror, perjured¹⁵⁵ witness for perjured witness, conniving¹⁵⁶ lawyer for conniving lawyer, partisan¹⁵⁷ reporter for partisan reporter, these cockeyed armies had fought each other to an exhausted¹⁵⁸ standoff.