PATRIMONY1. Patrimony is sometimes understood to mean all kinds of property but its more limited signification , includes only such estate, as has descended2 in the same family and in a still more confined sense, it is only that which has descended or been devised in a direct line from the father, and by extension, from the mother, or other ancestor.
2 . By patrimony, patrimonium, is also understood the father's duty to take care of his children. Sw. pt. 3, §18, n. 31, p. 235.
PATRINUS. A godfather.
PATRON, eccles. law. He who has the disposition3 and gift of an ecclesiastical benefice. In the Roman law it signified the former master of a freedman. Dig. 2, 4, 8, 1.
PATRONAGE4. The right of appointing to office; as the patronage of the president of the United States, if abused, may endanger the liberties of the people.
2. In the ecclesiastical law, it signifies the right of presentation to a church or ecclesiastical benefice. 2 Bl. Com. 21.
PATRONUS, Roman civil law. This word is a modification5 of the, Latin word pater, father; a denomination6 applied7 by Romulus to the first, senators of Rome, and which they always afterwards bore. Romulus at first appointed a hundred of them. Seven years afterwards, in consequence of the association of Tatius to the Romans, a hundred more were appointed, chosen from the Sabines. Tarquinius Priscus increased the number to three hundred. Those appointed by Romulus and Tatius were called patres majorum gentium and the others were called patres minorum gentium. These and their descendants constituted, the nobility of Rome. The rest of the people were called lebeians, every one of whom was obliged to choose one of these fathers as his patron. The relation thus constituted involved important consequences. The plebeian8, who was called (cliens) a client, was obliged to furnish the means of maintenance to his chosen patron; to firnish a portion for his patron's daughters; to ransom9 him and his sons, if captured by an enemy, and pay all sums recovered against him by judgment10, of the 'courts. The patron, on the other hand, was, obliged to watch over the interests of his client, whether present or absent to protect his person and property, and especially to defend him in all, actions brought against him for any cause. Neither could accuse or bear testimony11 against the other, or give contrary votes, &c. The contract was of a sacred nature,; the violation12 of it was a sort of treason, and punishable as such. According to Cicero, (De Repub. II. 9,) this relation formed an integral part of the governmental system, Et habutit plebem in clientelas principum descri ptum, which he affirms was eminently13 useful. Blackstone traces the system of vassalage14 to this. ancient relation of patron and client. It was, in fact, of the same nature as the feudal15 institutions of the middle ages, designed to maintain order in a rising state by a combination of the opposing interests of the aristocracy and of the common people, upon the principle of reciprocal bonds for mutual16 interests, Dumazeau, Barreau Romain, §III. Ultimately, by force of radical17 changes in the institution, the word patronus came to signify notbing more than an advocate. Id. IV