Researchers determined¹ that the specimens³ are around 195,000 years old.
对化石的深入分析使现代人的历史可以追溯到19.5万年以前。

A new analysis of bones unearthed⁴（采掘出的） nearly 40 years ago in Ethiopia has pushed the fossil record of modern humans back to nearly 200,000 years ago perhaps close to the dawn of the species.

Researchers determined that the specimens are around 195,000 years old. Previously⁵, the oldest known fossils of Homo sapiens were Ethiopian skulls⁷ dated to about 160,000 years ago.

Genetic⁸ studies estimate that Homo sapiens（智人） arose about 200,000 years ago, so the new research brings the fossil record more in line with that, said John Fleagle of Stony⁹ Brook¹⁰ University in New York, an author of the study.

The fossils were found in 1967 near the Omo River in southwestern Ethiopia. One location yielded Omo I, which includes part of a skull⁶ plus skeletal（骨骼的） bones. Another site produced Omo II, which has more of a skull but no skeletal bones. Neither specimen² has a complete face.

Although Omo II shows more primitive¹¹（原始的） characteristics than Omo I, scientists called both specimens Homo sapiens and assigned a tentative（试验性质的，暂时的） age of 130,000 years.

Now, after visiting the discovery sites, analyzing¹² their geology（地质学） and testing rock samples with more modern dating techniques, Fleagle and colleagues report in Thursday's issue of the journal Nature that both specimens are 195,000 years old, give or take 5,000 years.

Fleagle said the more primitive traits（特征） of Omo II may mean the two specimens came from different but overlapping¹³ Homo sapiens populations, or that they just represent natural variation within a single population.

To find the age of the skulls, the researchers determined that volcanic¹⁴ rock lying just below the sediment¹⁵ that contained the fossils was about 196,000 years old. They then found evidence that the fossil-bearing sediment was deposited soon after that time.

Paul Renne, director of the Berkeley Geochronology Center, which specializes in dating rocks, said the researchers made "a reasonably good argument" to support their dating of the fossils.

"It's more likely than not," he said, calling the work "very exciting and important."