Cities have long been likened to organisms, ant colonies, and river networks. But these and other analogies fail to capture the essence of how cities really function. New research by Santa Fe Institute Professor Luis Bettencourt suggests a city is something new in nature -- a sort of social
reactor1 that is part star and part network, he says.
"It's an
entirely2 new kind of complex system that we humans have created," he says. "We have intuitively invented the best way to create vast social networks
embedded3 in space and time, and keep them growing and evolving without having to stop. When that is possible, a social species can sustain ways of being incredibly inventive and productive."
In a paper published this week in Science, Bettencourt
derives4 a series of mathematical formulas that describe how cities' properties vary in relation to their population size, and then
posits5 a novel
unified6,
quantitative7 framework for understanding how cities function and grow.
His resulting theoretical framework predicts very closely dozens of
statistical8 relationships observed in thousands of real cities around the world for which reliable data are available.
"As more people lead urban lives and the number and size of cities expand everywhere, understanding more
quantitatively9 how cities function is increasingly important," Bettencourt says. "Only with a much better understanding of what cities are will we be able to seize the opportunities that cities create and try to avoid some of the immense problems they present. This framework is a step toward a better grasp of the functioning of cities everywhere."
What has made this new view of cities possible is the growing opportunities in recent years to collect and share data on many aspects of urban life. With so much new data, says Bettencourt, it's easier than ever to study the basic properties of cities in terms of general statistical patterns of such variables as land use, urban
infrastructure10, and rates of socioeconomic activity.
For more than a decade, Bettencourt and members of SFI's Cities & Urbanization research team have used this data to
painstakingly11 lay the foundation for a quantitative theory of cities. Its bricks and
mortar12 are the statistical "scaling" relationships that seem to predict, based on a city's size, the average numerical characteristics of a city, from the number of patents it produces to the total length of its roads or the number of social interactions its inhabitants enjoy.
Those relationships and the related equations, models, network analyses, and methods provide the basis for Bettencourt's theoretical framework.
So what is a city? Bettencourt thinks the only
metaphor13 that comes close to capturing a city's function is from stellar physics: "A city is first and foremost a social reactor," Bettencourt explains. "It works like a star, attracting people and accelerating social interaction and social outputs in a way that is
analogous14 to how stars compress matter and burn brighter and faster the bigger they are."
This, too, is an analogy though, because the math of cities is very different from that of stars, he says.