Reducing the amount of sunlight reaching the planet's surface by geoengineering may not undo¹ climate change after all. Two German researchers used a simple energy balance analysis to explain how Earth's water cycle responds differently to heating by sunlight than it does to warming due to a stronger atmospheric² greenhouse effect. Further, they show that this difference implies that reflecting sunlight to reduce temperatures may have unwanted effects on Earth's rainfall patterns. The results are now published in Earth System Dynamics³, an open access journal of the European Geosciences Union (EGU).

 

Global warming alters Earth's water cycle since more water evaporates to the air as temperatures increase. Increased evaporation⁴ can dry out some regions while, at the same time, result in more rain falling in other areas due to the excess moisture（水分，湿度） in the atmosphere. The more water evaporates per degree of warming, the stronger the influence of increasing temperature on the water cycle. But the new study shows the water cycle does not react the same way to different types of warming.

 

Axel Kleidon and Maik Renner of the Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry in Jena, Germany, used a simple energy balance model to determine how sensitive the water cycle is to an increase in surface temperature due to a stronger greenhouse effect and to an increase in solar radiation. They predicted the response of the water cycle for the two cases and found that, in the former, evaporation（蒸发） increases by 2% per degree of warming while in the latter this number reaches 3%. This prediction confirmed results of much more complex climate models.

 

"These different responses to surface heating are easy to explain," says Kleidon, who uses a pot on the kitchen stove as an analogy. "The temperature in the pot is increased by putting on a lid or by turning up the heat -- but these two cases differ by how much energy flows through the pot," he says. A stronger greenhouse effect puts a thicker 'lid' over Earth's surface but, if there is no additional sunlight (if we don't turn up the heat on the stove), extra evaporation takes place solely⁵ due to the increase in temperature. Turning up the heat by increasing solar radiation, on the other hand, enhances the energy flow through Earth's surface because of the need to balance the greater energy input⁶ with stronger cooling fluxes⁷ from the surface. As a result, there is more evaporation and a stronger effect on the water cycle.

 

In the new Earth System Dynamics study the authors also show how these findings can have profound consequences for geoengineering. Many geoengineering approaches aim to reduce global warming by reducing the amount of sunlight reaching Earth's surface (or, in the pot analogy, reduce the heat from the stove). But when Kleidon and Renner applied⁸ their results to such a geoengineering scenario⁹, they found out that simultaneous changes in the water cycle and the atmosphere cannot be compensated¹⁰ for at the same time. Therefore, reflecting sunlight by geoengineering is unlikely to restore the planet's original climate.

点击收听单词发音