THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you.  Thank you very much.  Thank you.  Please, everybody be seated.  Thank you.  Thank you, John, for the gracious亲切的，和蔼的 introduction.  To Mike and Eric, thank you for hosting me.  Thank you to all of you for receiving me.  It is  wonderful to be here.  I want to also acknowledge Mark Strand¹, president of the Congressional Institute.  To all the family members who are here and who have to put up with us for an elective office each and every day, thank you, because I know that's tough.  (Applause.)

I very much am appreciative² of not only the tone of your introduction, John, but also the invitation that you extended to me.  You know what they say, "Keep your friends close, but visit the Republican Caucus³干部会议，核心会议 every few months."  (Laughter.)

Part of the reason I accepted your invitation to come here was because I wanted to speak with all of you, and not just to all of you.  So I'm looking forward to taking your questions and having a real conversation in a few moments.  And I hope that the conversation we begin here doesn't end here; that we can continue our dialogue in the days ahead.  It's important to me that we do so.  It's important to you, I think, that we do so.  But most importantly, it's important to the American people that we do so.

I've said this before, but I'm a big believer not just in the value of a loyal opposition⁴, but in its necessity.  Having differences of opinion, having a real debate about matters of domestic policy and national security -- and that's not something that's only good for our country, it's absolutely essential.  It's only through the process of disagreement and debate that bad ideas get tossed out扔出 and good ideas get refined and made better.  And that kind of vigorous back and forth⁵ -- that imperfect but well-founded process, messy as it often is -- is at the heart of our democracy.  That's what makes us the greatest nation in the world.

So, yes, I want you to challenge my ideas, and I guarantee you that after reading this I may challenge a few of yours.  (Laughter.)  I want you to stand up for your beliefs, and knowing this caucus, I have no doubt that you will.  I want us to have a constructive⁶ debate.  The only thing I don't want -- and here I am listening to the American people, and I think they don't want either -- is for Washington to continue being so Washington-like.  I know folks人们, when we're in town there, spend a lot of time reading the polls and looking at focus groups and interpreting which party has the upper hand in November and in 2012 and so on and so on and so on.  That's their obsession困扰，痴迷.

And I'm not a pundit⁷博学者.  I'm just a President, so take it for what it's worth.  But I don't believe that the American people want us to focus on our job security.  They want us to focus on their job security.  (Applause.)  I don't think they want more gridlock.  I don't think they want more partisanship⁸.  I don't think they want more obstruction⁹.  They didn't send us to Washington to fight each other in some sort of political steel-cage match to see who comes out alive.  That's not what they want.  They sent us to Washington to work together, to get things done, and to solve the problems that they're grappling with扭打，努力克服 every single day.

And I think your constituents¹⁰ would want to know that despite the fact it doesn't get a lot of attention, you and I have actually worked together on a number of occasions.  There have been times where we've acted in a bipartisan两党连立的 fashion.  And I want to thank you and your Democratic colleagues for reaching across the aisle¹¹.  There has been, for example, broad support for putting in the troops necessary in Afghanistan to deny al Qaeda safe haven¹², to break the Taliban's momentum¹³动力，动量, and to train Afghan security forces.  There's been broad support for disrupting, dismantling¹⁴解散，分解, and defeating al Qaeda.  And I know that we're all united in our admiration¹⁵ of our troops.  (Applause.)

So it may be useful for the international audience right now to understand -- and certainly for our enemies to have no doubt -- whatever divisions and differences may exist in Washington, the United States of America stands as one to defend our country.  (Applause.)

It's that same spirit of bipartisanship两党制，两党合作 that made it possible for me to sign a defense¹⁶ contracting reform bill that was cosponsored共同赞助者，共同主办人 by Senator McCain and members of Congress here today.  We've stood together on behalf of our nation's veterans.  Together we passed the largest increase in the VA's budget in more than 30 years and supported essential veterans' health care reforms to provide better access and medical care for those who serve in uniform.

Some of you also joined Democrats¹⁷ in supporting a Credit Card Bill of Rights and in extending unemployment compensation to Americans who are out of work.  Some of you joined us in stopping tobacco companies from targeting kids, expanding opportunities for young people to serve our country, and helping¹⁸ responsible homeowners stay in their homes.

So we have a track record of working together.  It is possible.  But, as John, you mentioned, on some very big things, we've seen party-line votes that, I'm just going to be honest, were disappointing.  Let's start with our efforts to jumpstart安装，引进 the economy last winter, when we were losing 700,000 jobs a month.  Our financial system teetered on the brink¹⁹ of濒临 collapse²⁰ and the threat of a second Great Depression loomed²¹ large.  I didn't understand then, and I still don't understand, why we got opposition in this caucus for almost $300 billion in badly needed tax cuts for the American people, or COBRA coverage²² to help Americans who've lost jobs in this recession to keep the health insurance that they desperately²³ needed, or opposition to putting Americans to work laying broadband and rebuilding roads and bridges and breaking ground on new construction projects.

There was an interesting headline in CNN today:  "Americans disapprove²⁴ of stimulus²⁵刺激，激励, but like every policy in it."  And there was a poll that showed that if you broke it down into its component²⁶ parts, 80 percent approved of the tax cuts, 80 percent approved of the infrastructure²⁷, 80 percent approved of the assistance to the unemployed²⁸.

Well, that's what the Recovery Act was.  And let's face it, some of you have been at the ribbon-cuttings for some of these important projects in your communities.  Now, I understand some of you had some philosophical²⁹ differences perhaps on the just the concept of government spending, but, as I recall, opposition was declared before we had a chance to actually meet and exchange ideas.  And I saw that as a missed opportunity.

Now, I am happy to report this morning that we saw another sign that our economy is moving in the right direction.  The latest GDP numbers show that our economy is growing by almost 6 percent -- that's the most since 2003.  To put that in perspective正确地, this time last year, we weren't seeing positive job growth; we were seeing the economy shrink by about 6 percent.

So you've seen a 12 percent reversal逆转，撤销 during the course of this year.  This turnaround is the biggest in nearly three decades -- and it didn't happen by accident.  It happened -- as economists³⁰, conservative and liberal, will attest³¹ -- because of some of the steps that we took.

And by the way, you mentioned a Web site out here, John --  if you want to look at what's going on, on the Recovery Act, you can look on recovery.gov -- a Web site, by the way, that was Eric Cantor's idea.

Now, here's the point.  These are serious times, and what's required by all of us -- Democrats and Republicans -- is to do what's right for our country, even if it's not always what's best for our politics.  I know it may be heresy异教，异端 to say this, but there are things more important than good poll numbers.  And on this no one can accuse me of not living by my principles.  (Laughter.)  A middle class that's back on its feet, an economy that lifts everybody up, an America that's ascendant优势 in the world -- that's more important than winning an election.  Our future shouldn't be shaped by what's best for our politics; our politics should be shaped by what's best for our future.