| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
73. The author of this editorial asserts that trespassing1, vandalism, and theft associated with stealing fruit from farms is a trivial problem and, as a result, enacting2 laws to protect farm- and land-owners from these crimes is a waste of lawmakers' time. In support of this claim, the author points out only that the nation's cities are plagued by far more serious problems of violence and crime. To the extent that this author has provided any argument at all, it is a poor one, First of all, the author unfairly assumes that if lawmakers are taking rural crime issues seriously, then they cannot be taking urban crime issues seriously. The author is presenting a false dilemma3 by imposing4 an either-or choice between two courses of action that need not be mutually exclusive. It is equally possible that legislators can address both areas of concern concurrently5. Secondly6, the argument relies on the assumption that the legislators in question have the opportunity to address urban crime problems. However, we are not told whether this legislature's jurisdiction7 encompasses8 both rural and urban areas. If it encompasses only rural areas, then the author's implicit9 conclusion that the legislators in this region should instead be addressing urban crime problems would be completely undermined. Finally, the author unfairly trivializes the severity of rural crime by simply comparing it with urban crime. While trespassing, vandalism, and fruit-stealing may seem minor10 peccadilloes11, especially compared to violent urban crimes, these rural crimes might nevertheless result in serious financial damage to farm owners, depending on the frequency and extent of the violations12. The author fails to provide evidence for the claim that these rural crimes are trivial. Instead, the author attempts to call attention to a more dramatic but potentially irrelevant13 problem. In conclusion, the argument is weak. It potentially distorts the alternatives available to legislators in the region, as well as deflecting14 attention from the problem at hand. To better evaluate it, we would need more information about the geographical15 scope of this legislature's jurisdiction and about the extent of the fruit-stealing problem in the region. 点击收听单词发音
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TAG标签:
- 发表评论
-
- 最新评论 进入详细评论页>>