| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. In this argument the author concludes that the Apogee1 Company should dose down field offices and conduct all its operations from a single, centralized location because the company had been more profitable in the past when all its operations were in one location. For a couple of reasons, this argument is not very convincing. First, the author assumes that centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and streamlining supervision2 of employees. This assumption is never supported with any data or projections3. Moreover, the assumption fails to take into account cost increases and inefficiency4 that could result from centralization. For instance, company representatives would have to travel to do business in areas formerly5 served by a field office, creating travel costs and loss of critical time. In short, this assumption must be supported with a thorough cost-benefit analysis of centralization versus6 other possible cost-cutting and/or profit-enhancing strategies. Second, the only reason offered by the author is the claim that Apogee was more profitable when it had operated from a single, centralized location. But is centralization the only difference relevant to greater past profitability? It is entirely7 possible that management has become lax regarding any number of factors that can affect the bottom line such as inferior products, careless product pricing, inefficient8 production, poor employee expense account monitoring, ineffective advertising9, sloppy10 buying policies and other wasteful11 spending. Unless the author can rule out other factors relevant to diminishing profits, this argument commits the fallacy of assuming that just because one event (decreasing profits) follows another (decentralization), the second event has been caused by the first. In conclusion, this is a weak argument. To strengthen the conclusion that Apogee should close field offices and centralize. This author must provide a thorough cost- benefit analysis of available alternatives and rule out factors other than decentralization that might be affecting current profits negatively. 点击收听单词发音
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TAG标签:
- 发表评论
-
- 最新评论 进入详细评论页>>