Passage 44
In the seventeenth-century Florentine textile industry, women were employed primarily in
low-paying, low-skill jobs. To explain this segregation¹ of labor² by gender³, economists⁴ have relied
on the useful theory of human capital. According to this theory, investment in human capital-the
acquisition of difficult job-related skills-generally benefits individuals by making them eligible⁵ to
engage in well-paid occupations. Women’s role as child bearers, however, results in interruptions
in their participation⁶ in the job market (as compared with men’s) and thus reduces their
opportunities to acquire training for highly skilled work. In addition, the human capital theory
explains why there was a high concentration of women workers in certain low-skill jobs, such as
weaving, but not in others, such as combing or carding, by positing⁷ that because of their primary
responsibility in child rearing women took occupations that could be carried out in the home.
There were, however, differences in pay scales that cannot be explained by the human capital
theory. For example, male construction workers were paid significantly higher wage than female
taffeta weavers⁸. The wage difference between these two low-skill occupations stems from the
segregation of labor by gender: because a limited number of occupations were open to women,
there was a large supply of workers in their fields, and this “overcrowding” resulted in women
receiving lower wages and men receiving higher wages.
 
265. The passage suggests that combing and carding differ from weaving in that combing and
carding are
(A)   low-skill jobs performed by primarily by women employees
(B)    low-skill jobs that were not perfomed in the home
(C)    low-skill jobs performed by both male and female employees
(D)    high-skill jobs performed outside the home (B)
(E)     high-skill jobs performed by both male and female employees
 
266. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the explanation provided by the human
capital theory for women’s concentration in certain occupations in seventeenth-century Florence?
(A)   Women were unlikely to work outside the home even in occupations whose hourse were flexible enough to allow women to accommodate domestic tasks as well as paid labor.
(B)    Parents were less likely to teach occupational skills to their daughters than they were to their sons.
(C)    Women’s participation in the Florentine paid labor force grew steadily⁹ throughout the xisteenth and seventeenth centuries.
(D)    The vast amjority of female weavers in the Florenine wool industry had children. (A)
(E)     Few women worked as weavers in the Florentine silk industry, which was devoted¹⁰ to making cloths that requried a high degree of skill to produce.
 
267. The author of the passage would be most likely to describe the explanation provided by the
human capital theory for the high concentration of women in certain occupations in the
seventeenth-century Florence textile industry as
(A)   well founded though incomplete
(B)    difficult to arciculate
(C)    plausible but poorly substantiated
(D)    seriously flawed (A)
(E)     contrary to recent research

上一篇：GMAT考试RCOGWORD（四三） 下一篇：GMAT考试RCOGWORD（四五）