Passage 40

　　Joseph Glarthaar‘s Forged in Battle is not the first excel-lent study of Black soldiers and their White officers in the　Civil War， but it uses more soldiers’ letters and diaries-　including rare material from Black soldiers-and concen-（5） rates more intensely on Black-White relations in Black　regiments¹ than do any of its predecessors². Glathaar‘s title　expresses his thesis： loyalty³， friendship， and respect among　White officers and Black soldiers were fostered by the　mutual⁴ dangers they faced in combat.
　　（10 ） Glarthaar accurately⁵ describes the government‘s discrim-inatory treatment of Black soldiers in pay， promotion⁶， medi　cal care， and job assignments， appropriately emphasizing　the campaign by Black soldiers and their officers to get the opportunity to fight. That chance remained limited through（15） out the war by army policies that kept most Black units serving in rear-echelon assignments and working in labor⁷ battalions⁸. Thus， while their combat death rate was only one-third that of White units， their mortality rate from disease， a major killer⁹ in his war， was twice as great.
　　（20） Despite these obstacles， the courage and effectiveness of several Black units in combat won increasing respect from　 initially¹⁰ skeptical¹¹ or hostile White soldiers. As one White officer put it，“they have fought their way into the respectof all the army.”
　　（25） In trying to demonstrate the magnitude of this attitudi-nal change， however，Glarthaar seems to exaggerate the　prewar racism¹² of the White men who became officers in Black regiments. “Prior to the war，” he writes of thesemen，“virtually all of them held powerful racial prejudices.”（30） While perhaps true of those officers who joined Black units for promotion or other self-serving motives¹³， this state-ment misrepresents the attitudes of the many abolitionists who became officers in Black regiments. Having spent years fighting against the race prejudice endemic in Ameri-（35）can society； they participated eagerly in this military exper-iment， which they hoped would help African Americansachieve freedom and postwar civil equality. By currentstandards of racial egalitarianism， these men‘s paternalismtoward African Americans was racist¹⁴. But to call their（40）feelings “powerful racial prejudices” is to indulge ingenerational chauvinism-to judge past eras by presentstandards.

　　1. The passage as a whole can best be characterized as which of the following？
　　　（A） An evaluation¹⁵ of a scholarly study
　　　（B） A description of an attitudinal change
　　　（C） A discussion of an analytical¹⁶ defect
　　　（D） An analysis of the causes of a phenomenon
　　　（E） An argument in favor of revising a view

　　2. According to the author， which of the following is true of Glarthaar‘s Forged in Battle compared with previous studies　on the same topic？
　　　（A） It is more reliable and presents a more complete picture of the historical events on which it concentrates than do previous studies.
　　　（B） It uses more of a particular kind of source material and focuses more closely on a particular aspect of the topic than do previous studies.
　　　（C） It contains some unsupported generalizations¹⁷， but it rightly emphasizes a theme ignored by most previous studies.
　　　（D） It surpasses previous studies on the same topic in that it accurately describes conditions often neglected by those studies.
　　　（E） It makes skillful use of supporting evidence to illustrate¹⁸ a subtle trend that previous studies have failed to detect.

　　3. The author implies that the title of Glatthaar‘s book refers　specifically to which of the following？
　　　（A） The sense of pride and accomplishment¹⁹ that Black soldiers increasingly felt as a result of their Civil War experiences
　　　（B） The civil equality that African Americans achieved after the Civil War， partly as a result of their use of organizational skills honed by combat
　　　（C） The changes in discriminatory army policies that were made as a direct result of the performance of Black  combat units during the Civil War
　　　（D） The improved interracial relations that were formed by the races‘ facing of common dangers and their waging of a common fight during the Civil War
　　　（E） The standards of racial egalitarianism that came to be adopted as a result of White Civil War veterans‘ repudiation²⁰ of the previous racism

　　4. The passage mentions which of the following as an　important theme that receives special emphasis in Glarthaar‘s book？
　　　（A） The attitudes of abolitionist officers in Black units
　　　（B） The struggle of Black units to get combat assignments
　　　（C） The consequences of the poor medical care received by Black soldiers
　　　（D） The motives of officers serving in Black units
　　　（E） The discrimination that Black soldiers faced when trying for promotions²¹

　　5. The passage suggests that which of the following was true of　Black units‘ disease mortality rates in the Civil War？
　　　（A） They were almost as high as the combat mortality rates of White units.
　　　（B） They resulted in part from the relative inexperience of these units when in combat.
　　　（C） They were especially high because of the nature of these units‘ usual duty assignments.
　　　（D） They resulted in extremely high overall casualty rates in Black combat units.
　　　（E） They exacerbated²² the morale²³ problems that were caused by the army‘s discriminatory policies.

　　6. The author of the passage quotes the White officer in lines 23-24 primarily in order to provide evidence to support the　contention²⁴ that
　　　（A） virtually all White officers initially had hostile attitudes toward Black soldiers
　　　（B） Black soldiers were often forced to defend themselves from physical attacks initiated²⁵ by soldiers from White units
　　　（C） the combat performance of Black units changed the attitudes of White soldiers toward Black soldiers
　　　（D） White units paid especially careful attention to the performance of Black units in battle
　　　（E） respect in the army as a whole was accorded only to those units， whether Black or White， that performed well in battle

　　7. Which of the following best describes the kind of error　attributed to Glarthaar in lines 25-28？
　　　（A） Insisting on an unwarranted distinction between two groups of individuals in order to render an argument concerning them internally consistent
　　　（B） Supporting an argument in favor of a given interpretation²⁶ of a situation with evidence that is not particularly relevant to the situation
　　　（C） Presenting a distorted view of the motives of certain individuals in order to provide grounds for a negative evaluation of their actions
　　　（D） Describing the conditions prevailing²⁷ before a given event in such a way that the contrast with those prevailing after the event appears more striking than it　　 actually is
　　　（E） Asserting that a given event is caused by another event merely because the other event occurred before the given event occurred

　　8. Which of the following actions can best be described as　indulging in “generational chauvinism”（lines 40-41） as that　practice is defined in the passage？
　　　（A） Condemning²⁸ a present-day monarch²⁹ merely because many monarchs³⁰ have been tyrannical in the past.
　　　（B） Clinging to the formal standards of politeness common in one‘s youth to such a degree that any relaxation³¹ of those standards is intolerable
　　　（C） Questioning the accuracy of a report written by an employee merely because of the employee‘s gender³².
　　　（D） Deriding³³ the superstitions³⁴ accepted as “science” in past eras without acknowledging the prevalence of irrational³⁵ beliefs today.
　　　（E） Labeling a nineteenth-century politician as “corrupt” for engaging in once-acceptable practices considered intolerable today.