奥巴马演讲 关于绿色车队行动的讲话3
文章来源:未知 文章作者:enread 发布时间:2011-04-03 02:10 字体: [ ]  进入论坛
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)

And one of the things that I heard repeatedly, and some of the folks who are already driving some of these cars will tell you that -- or these trucks -- will tell you, and that is making sure that we’ve got stations, charging stations, if we’re talking about electric vehicles; making sure that we’ve got fueling stations if we’re talking about natural gas conversion1(转变) .  That’s critical.  And we don’t have the distribution platforms right now.  That’s something that we’ve really got to work on.

Meanwhile, we’re also investing in the advanced batteries that can power these electric vehicles -- investments that are already making a difference.  You know, a couple of years ago, America produced less than 2 percent of the world’s advanced batteries.  These are the batteries that go into these hybrids2(杂交,混血) and these electric cars.  We produce less than 2 percent of them.  Over the last few years, we’ve made investments in a homegrown American advanced battery industry.  And partly because of the investments that we’ve made, we’re going to be able to produce 40 percent of the world’s advanced batteries.  So we’ve helped jumpstart(安装,引进) a big new industry right here in the United States of America, and that’s a smart investment.  (Applause.)

So that’s the kind of partnership3 between business and government that’s always made our economy strong, and I think there’s a lesson in that.  It’s not the role of government to be the engine of innovation and prosperity in America.  That’s the job of entrepreneurs and executives and the outstanding workers of the companies that are represented here.  You’re the ones who are really making innovation happen.  But government does have the ability to spark innovation, to support the research, the scientific discovery, that has always led to breakthroughs and new products.  And it’s in our national interest to make these investments.

For example, we were just talking about some of these trucks -- there is still work to be done to make the fueling faster, to bring down the price.  And all of those things require some innovation and some new technologies so that in the end it’s not only as cheap to run a truck like this, or purchase a truck like this, but it’s cheaper than a traditional engine.  There’s going to be more work to do on this, and historically individual companies may not be able to make all those investments on their own.  Government has to make those investments.

Now, this is tougher to do in light of the deficit4 that I inherited when I took office.  We’re all concerned about our debt.  We’re all concerned about our deficit.  And that’s why I’ve proposed some deep cuts in spending so we can live within our means and focus the -- on the investments that are most likely to help grow our economy and create jobs -– investments in education, investments in our infrastructure5, investments in research and development, investments in clean energy technologies of the kind that I’ve talked about today.  We’ve got to make those investments; otherwise we’re going to fall behind other countries.  China is making those investments.  Germany is making those investments.  South Korea is making those investments.  We can’t afford to fall behind.

So the key issue here is how do we pay for all this at a time when we’ve also got to shrink(收缩) the deficit.  Well, that means we’ve got to make some tough choices.  We got to stop spending on things that we don't need to spend on things that we do.  And right now, there’s a debate about all this going on in Washington as Congress puts together a budget for this year, and then we’re going to have to put together a budget for next year.

So far, after a few weeks of negotiations6 between Democrats7, Republicans, and my team at the White House, it appears that we’re getting close to an agreement between the leaders of both parties on how much spending we should cut.  There are still details and differences to work out.  And what I’ve said is, neither Democrats or Republicans should get 100 percent of what they want.  They’re going to have to compromise.  They’re going to have to figure this out.

Both sides are close, though, and we know that a compromise is within reach.  And we also know that we can’t afford not to have Congress work out these budgets and make sure that we’re investing in the right things.  If these budget negotiations break down, we could end up having to shut down the government, just at a time when the economy is starting to recover.

That could jeopardize8(危害) the economic recovery.  It has an impact on everybody’s bottom line.  UPS, I know, delivers a lot of packages to the U.S. government.  You don’t need a shutdown right now.  Every business here could be impacted.  We can’t allow that to happen.

So given the encouraging news we received today on jobs, it would be the height of irresponsibility to halt our economic momentum9 because of the same old Washington politics.  That’s not what we need.  (Applause.)

The American people, they don’t want us to go to our respective corners and then just have the same battles we’ve been having for decades now.  It can’t be “my way or the highway.”  They want their leaders to come together.  And right now, I believe we have a real opportunity to do just that, in the same way that we did back in December when we cut taxes for the American people in a bipartisan(两党连立的) way.

So it’s time to agree on a budget that makes us live within our means while still investing in our future.  That’s how these businesses operate and that’s why they’re successful.  Businesses have gone through tough times during this recession and had to make some cutbacks on things that weren’t needed.  But that made those companies stronger.  The same can be true for America as a whole.  That’s how we’re going to keep our economy growing.  That’s how we’re going to put our people back to work.  That’s how we’re going to keep the American Dream alive for the next generation.

And so I just want to say to all of you, thank you for all the extraordinary work you’ve done.  Thank you for your help.  We’ve got to get busy.  God bless you.  And God bless the United States of America.  Thank you.  (Applause.)



点击收听单词发音收听单词发音  

1 conversion UZPyI     
n.转化,转换,转变
参考例句:
  • He underwent quite a conversion.他彻底变了。
  • Waste conversion is a part of the production process.废物处理是生产过程的一个组成部分。
2 hybrids a5030918be299fefcf603b9326766b39     
n.杂交生成的生物体( hybrid的名词复数 );杂交植物(或动物);杂种;(不同事物的)混合物
参考例句:
  • All these brightly coloured hybrids are so lovely in the garden. 花园里所有这些色彩鲜艳的杂交花真美丽。 来自辞典例句
  • The notion that interspecific hybrids are rare is ill-founded. 有一种看法认为种间杂种是罕见的,这种看法是无根据的。 来自辞典例句
3 partnership NmfzPy     
n.合作关系,伙伴关系
参考例句:
  • The company has gone into partnership with Swiss Bank Corporation.这家公司已经和瑞士银行公司建立合作关系。
  • Martin has taken him into general partnership in his company.马丁已让他成为公司的普通合伙人。
4 deficit tmAzu     
n.亏空,亏损;赤字,逆差
参考例句:
  • The directors have reported a deficit of 2.5 million dollars.董事们报告赤字为250万美元。
  • We have a great deficit this year.我们今年有很大亏损。
5 infrastructure UbBz5     
n.下部构造,下部组织,基础结构,基础设施
参考例句:
  • We should step up the development of infrastructure for research.加强科学基础设施建设。
  • We should strengthen cultural infrastructure and boost various types of popular culture.加强文化基础设施建设,发展各类群众文化。
6 negotiations af4b5f3e98e178dd3c4bac64b625ecd0     
协商( negotiation的名词复数 ); 谈判; 完成(难事); 通过
参考例句:
  • negotiations for a durable peace 为持久和平而进行的谈判
  • Negotiations have failed to establish any middle ground. 谈判未能达成任何妥协。
7 democrats 655beefefdcaf76097d489a3ff245f76     
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 )
参考例句:
  • The Democrats held a pep rally on Capitol Hill yesterday. 民主党昨天在国会山召开了竞选誓师大会。
  • The democrats organize a filibuster in the senate. 民主党党员组织了阻挠议事。 来自《简明英汉词典》
8 jeopardize s3Qxd     
vt.危及,损害
参考例句:
  • Overworking can jeopardize your health.工作过量可能会危及你的健康。
  • If you are rude to the boss it may jeopardize your chances of success.如果你对上司无礼,那就可能断送你成功的机会。
9 momentum DjZy8     
n.动力,冲力,势头;动量
参考例句:
  • We exploit the energy and momentum conservation laws in this way.我们就是这样利用能量和动量守恒定律的。
  • The law of momentum conservation could supplant Newton's third law.动量守恒定律可以取代牛顿第三定律。
TAG标签: industry power cars
发表评论
请自觉遵守互联网相关的政策法规,严禁发布色情、暴力、反动的言论。
评价:
表情:
验证码:点击我更换图片